tpo 40 human presence on Venus

Essay topics:

tpo 40 human presence on Venus

The material discusses the possibility to maintain a permanent human presence on Venus. While the reading claims that life on Venus is impossible, the listening challenges this and mentions that human presence on Venus could not be without challenges, but it is certainly possible.

First, the author states that the atmospheric pressure at Venus is 90 times greater than the pressure at Earth. On the other hand, The professor opposes this and posits that the spacecraft could float on the Venus like a ballon at distance 50 kilometers above Venus's surface. The lecture adds that the atmospheric pressure will be lower than Venus' surface, so there is no danger that spacecraft getting crushed.

Second, the reading mentions that on Venus there is no source for water and oxygen. On the contrary, the lecturer challenges this and contends that on Venus atmosphere has compounds of carbon dioxide and sulfuric acid. The professor says that water and oxygen could be produced through chemical processes. The speaker concludes that water and oxygen are not necessary to import to Venus.

Third, the writer states that the sunlight that reaches to Venus surface is not enough to produce electricity suitable to power machines and equipment. Conversely, the professor contradicts this and claims that on Venus there is a thick layer of clouds, however, above this layer is thin. In addition to that, the lecturer adds there is a reflect sunlight also, so they could collect the direct and reflected sunlight, and that produces enough electricity to power stations.

Votes
Average: 6.6 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 338, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...ion to that, the lecturer adds there is a reflect sunlight also, so they could collect th...
^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, conversely, first, however, if, second, so, third, while, in addition, on the contrary, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 7.30242825607 164% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 12.0772626932 124% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 22.412803532 98% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 30.3222958057 89% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1313.0 1373.03311258 96% => OK
No of words: 253.0 270.72406181 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.18972332016 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98822939669 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60812665971 2.5805825403 101% => OK
Unique words: 129.0 145.348785872 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.509881422925 0.540411800872 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 400.5 419.366225166 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 12.0 8.23620309051 146% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.0112373735 49.2860985944 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.416666667 110.228320801 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0833333333 21.698381199 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.66666666667 7.06452816374 137% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.428222164027 0.272083759551 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.163691953438 0.0996497079465 164% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0454376343028 0.0662205650399 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.252102160135 0.162205337803 155% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0431136234762 0.0443174109184 97% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.3589403974 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 53.8541721854 93% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.0289183223 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 12.2367328918 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.98 8.42419426049 107% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 63.6247240618 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.