Both the reading and the lecture are talking about whether it is possible to maintain a human presence on Venus, but the speaker disagrees with the perspective made in the reading that it is impossible for three reasons by pointing out these challenges can be possibly overcame by not establishing a station on the surface but on the 50 km above the surface like a balloon.
To begin with, according to the author, the atmospheric pressure is far greater than the earth's. But with the method to build a station 50 km above the surface, it can be easily solved because the pressure is equal to the earth's. That is why the opinion is challenged heavily.
Then the passage claims that people have to supply oxygen and water from earth which makes it impractical which is also disagreed by the speaker. He then states that the Venus' atmosphere contains some chemical materials such as carbon dioxide and sulfuric that can be used to produce water and oxygen. We don't need to carry these thus it is not a hard challenge. Therefore, the reading passage has been contradicted again.
Moreover, with little sunlight on the Venus' surface, humans could not get enough electricity to use as power by the author. On the contrary, the professor mentions that since the station will be floating 50 km above the surface where the atmosphere is not thick, there will be enough sunlight to make power. What's more, people can use both the direct sunlight and the reflect ones.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 306, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...be used to produce water and oxygen. We dont need to carry these thus it is not a ha...
^^^^
Line 7, column 309, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: What's
... will be enough sunlight to make power. Whats more, people can use both the direct su...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 365, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...le can use both the direct sunlight and the reflect ones.
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, moreover, so, then, therefore, thus, such as, talking about, on the contrary, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 10.4613686534 153% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 5.04856512141 158% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 22.412803532 67% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 30.3222958057 106% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1216.0 1373.03311258 89% => OK
No of words: 254.0 270.72406181 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.7874015748 5.08290768461 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99216450694 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50495200544 2.5805825403 97% => OK
Unique words: 141.0 145.348785872 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.555118110236 0.540411800872 103% => OK
syllable_count: 378.9 419.366225166 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 8.23620309051 36% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 21.2450331126 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 87.4604042642 49.2860985944 177% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.545454545 110.228320801 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0909090909 21.698381199 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.27272727273 7.06452816374 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.291305057388 0.272083759551 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0968928561008 0.0996497079465 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0732688364668 0.0662205650399 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.161383757393 0.162205337803 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0492263915195 0.0443174109184 111% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.3589403974 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 53.8541721854 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.8 12.2367328918 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.51 8.42419426049 101% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 63.6247240618 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 10.7273730684 168% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.498013245 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.