The reading passage explains the reasons why a permanent human presence on Venus is not feasible. Whereas, the lecturer counters the reading by providing a solution; by constructing a station floating at the elevation of 50 kilometers, the problems mentioned can be solved.
According to the reading, atmospheric pressure at Venus' surface is 90 times greater than that on Earth; hence, everything including spacecraft would be crushed once landing. The lecturer challenges that floating station at 50 kilometers above Venus' surface makes the atmospheric pressure bearable for human. In fact, it is the equivalent of that on Earth.
Second, the author suggests that there are barely oxygen and water on Venus and that it would be impractical to import these essentials from Earth. The lecturer refutes this point and contends that humans can convert carbon dioxide as well as sulfuric acid to oxygen and water vapor. In this way, humans can produce them instead of importing them from Earth.
Third, the author states that very few sunlight reaches the surface due to thick clouds, which contributes to the problem of generating electricity. The lecturer argues that it is solvable with the establishment of the floating station as it could collect the sunlight both from above and reflected below. Consequently, there will be adequate electricity to power machines.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 36, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U[6]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun sunlight seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'little sunlight'.
Suggestion: little sunlight
.... Third, the author states that very few sunlight reaches the surface due to thick clouds...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, hence, second, so, third, well, whereas, in fact, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 5.04856512141 139% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 22.412803532 76% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 30.3222958057 96% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1160.0 1373.03311258 84% => OK
No of words: 217.0 270.72406181 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.34562211982 5.08290768461 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8380880478 4.04702891845 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77235574566 2.5805825403 107% => OK
Unique words: 127.0 145.348785872 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.585253456221 0.540411800872 108% => OK
syllable_count: 351.0 419.366225166 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.3480267769 49.2860985944 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.454545455 110.228320801 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7272727273 21.698381199 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.18181818182 7.06452816374 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.377756351971 0.272083759551 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.129282598382 0.0996497079465 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0763025250386 0.0662205650399 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.205161096471 0.162205337803 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0733161151407 0.0443174109184 165% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.3589403974 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 53.8541721854 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.75 12.2367328918 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.53 8.42419426049 113% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 63.6247240618 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.7273730684 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 86.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.