Both the lecture and the passage is mainly whether humans can live on Venus or not. The reading asserts that it is impossible for humans to live there by mentioning tree reasons. Conversely, the professor rebuts the claim casting doubt in every single reason.
To begin with, the passage implies that atmospheric pressure at Venus' surface would crush human as well as it crushed all spacecraft which have landed on Venus. In the opposition, the speaker declares that the station for humans can be located higher than Venus surface where the atmospheric pressure is as same as earth. Therefore, it would be possible for humans to live there.
In addition, lack of water and oxygen is another problem has mentioned by the passage which cannot be provided from earth supply but this issue can be solved in the professor view. The professor adds that there are chemical compounds on the venus which can be used for oxygen and water production.
Finally, the passage argues that there is not enough sun for meeting the energy needed for machines and equipment due to densely clouds of carbon dioxide. The professor proclaims that the human also can use the energy of the sunlight which is reflected by clouds.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, conversely, finally, so, therefore, well, in addition, as well as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 5.04856512141 158% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 22.412803532 45% => OK
Preposition: 20.0 30.3222958057 66% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1003.0 1373.03311258 73% => OK
No of words: 205.0 270.72406181 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.89268292683 5.08290768461 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78388967377 4.04702891845 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.39325842759 2.5805825403 93% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 145.348785872 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.565853658537 0.540411800872 105% => OK
syllable_count: 314.1 419.366225166 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.6529948428 49.2860985944 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.3 110.228320801 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5 21.698381199 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.1 7.06452816374 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.340647607219 0.272083759551 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.137124200522 0.0996497079465 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0926055598219 0.0662205650399 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.194708662287 0.162205337803 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.112241453903 0.0443174109184 253% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.3589403974 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 53.8541721854 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 12.2367328918 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.4 8.42419426049 100% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 63.6247240618 77% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 65.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 19.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.