TPO 41 integrated
The reading passage states that power companies which use coal in their process argue new regulations for handling and stroring coal ash and provides three reasons for their argument. However, the professor claims that the new regulations are necessary and refutes each of reasons.
First, the article posits that there are effective environmetal regulations. In contrast, the lecturer states that the existence regulations are not realy sufficient. She explains that these regulations are only for new disposal ponds and lands and the old companies have no liner materials in their lands and in the lands that do not have controling systems (liner materials) leakage of pollution to soil will contaminate the drinking water. So the regulations should be for both of old and new companies.
Second, the reading claims that new regulations might discourage the recycling of coal ash. The professor refutes this point by stating that coal ash contains mecrury which is dangerous component and it could be harmful during handling and storage for recycling process. She says that if prople now ablut that they will become afraid and will not use coal ash which is a correct reaction.
Finally, the reading passage holds the view that new regulation will increase the disposal cost which leads to increase of price of electricity. However, the professor casts doubt this view and contends that the environmental benefits of new regulations will worth extra cost. She explains that investing money for doing of new regulations will be about 50 bilion dollars which is only 1 percent of the overal cost of comapny and it is not alot price for saving the environement.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 237, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tends that the environmental benefits of new regulations will worth extra cost. S...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, however, if, second, so, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 5.04856512141 178% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 7.30242825607 164% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 12.0772626932 149% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 22.412803532 112% => OK
Preposition: 19.0 30.3222958057 63% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1392.0 1373.03311258 101% => OK
No of words: 270.0 270.72406181 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15555555556 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05360046442 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67304792048 2.5805825403 104% => OK
Unique words: 137.0 145.348785872 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.507407407407 0.540411800872 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 416.7 419.366225166 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.3077543178 49.2860985944 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.0 110.228320801 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5 21.698381199 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.33333333333 7.06452816374 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.470788791576 0.272083759551 173% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.175808926032 0.0996497079465 176% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.112106263637 0.0662205650399 169% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.299236670901 0.162205337803 184% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.098826075379 0.0443174109184 223% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.3589403974 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 53.8541721854 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 12.2367328918 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.59 8.42419426049 102% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 63.6247240618 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.7273730684 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.