Some people believe that the Earth is being harmed (damaged) by human activity. Others feel that human activity makes the Earth a better place to live. What is your opinion? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
The Earth, a place that our living depend on its health has been changed during last years by human activities. Some activities had positive impact and some of them damaged earth. There is different opinion among people about these impacts. Some think only about positive impacts while others are worry about negative impacts. In my opinion human activities have damaged Earth for two important reason especially during last decades.
The main reason is that global warming has become critical issue around the world in last decades. One of the particular human activities which has direct effect on environmental condition of Earth is fossil fuel consumption. As human uses this kind of fuel to produce energy, Carbon dioxide emits to the atmosphere as a byproduct and causes global warming. Based on a scientific article which I read recently, this pollutant is considered as the most important greenhouse gas which is produced by human. As mentioned in that article emission of CO2 has resulted increasing ambient temperature about two degrees centigrade during last two decades which has caused a lot of problems in the world such as destruction of plants and decreasing food production in some countries. As you can see, emission of greenhouse gasses as a result of human activities has damaged the Earth and has caused a lot of problems.
Another reason is that human uses minerals day by day and changes face of the Earth and also destroys habitat of some animals. These events can lead to various problems such as extinction of animals and new unknown diseases. A documentary that I watched recently is a compelling example of this. The documentary was about extinction of a particular piece of animal and health effect of this extinction on local people. The documentary showed that a new cement factory was constructed near a village which didn’t have suitable facilities to control air emission. As a result of emission of pollutants, residents of the village faced with an unknown disease which didn’t have direct relation with inhalation of pollutants. The disease reason was the extinction of particular instinct which had eliminated harmful bacteria from the atmosphere. As a result of extinction of that instinct amount of harmful bacteria was increased and led to an unknown disease. This documentary showed that human activities can have negative effects which can make earth worth place for living.
In conclusion, I believe that human activities damage the earth by emission of different kind of pollutants and also extinction of animals and plants. I strongly feel that we have to do a lot of control measures to save the earth.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...reason especially during last decades. The main reason is that global warming h...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...arth and has caused a lot of problems. Another reason is that human uses minera...
^^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...can make earth worth place for living. In conclusion, I believe that human acti...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, while, in conclusion, kind of, such as, as a result, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 11.0286738351 163% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 43.0788530466 63% => OK
Preposition: 64.0 52.1666666667 123% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2237.0 1977.66487455 113% => OK
No of words: 434.0 407.700716846 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15437788018 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.56428161445 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77850855534 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 212.727598566 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.465437788018 0.524837075471 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 711.9 618.680645161 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.994623655914 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 3.08781362007 227% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.5749946012 48.9658058833 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.681818182 100.406767564 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7272727273 20.6045352989 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.63636363636 5.45110844103 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 11.8709677419 51% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.85842293907 233% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.274365287381 0.236089414692 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0862420129601 0.076458572812 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0738120336748 0.0737576698707 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.186743858248 0.150856017488 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0626076137383 0.0645574589148 97% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 11.7677419355 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.59 10.9000537634 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.44 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 86.8835125448 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.