TPO 41
Throughout the history teachers have played a prominent role in development of societies and flourishing of students. Due to its paramount importance nowadays, there are a lot of discussions about efficiency of teachers. In this regard, and considering their role in education of children, some people believe that teachers should be appreciated more than past, while others opinion is that teachers were better in the past. I am of the opinion that in the past teachers were more appreciated. I will attempt to address most discernible reasons below.
First, let me imply the difficulties of being a teacher in the past in comparison with today. In the past, people had to endure a lot of difficulties to be a teacher, which brought them more respect. But nowadays, it is easy to study in one of the numerous universities and get a certificate to be a teacher. In other words, the more difficulties a person faces to be a teacher, the more respect they could get. My grandfather's experience which was a teacher is compelling example of this. He was born in a small village and studied in the elementary school of village. For continuing the study, he had to abandon the village and live in a dorm in the nearest city to study in a high school. After high school, he left the nearest city and went to another far away city to study in a university. After living and studying almost for ten years far away from family, he came back to village and started to establish the first high school of the village. Now after almost sixty years of his death, people appreciate him because he suffered many difficulties to be a teacher. This experience taught me that teachers in the past had more respect than today.
As the second reason, I want to point out something which is widely accepted. It is now impossible to neglect the effect of internet in the respect that teachers get. Parents have communication with each other and they convey the information about the teachers of their children. So, they know how should a good teacher be? Considering that parents want best for children, if teachers are not the best they would not appreciate them. I witnessed my nephew in the last five years which his parents never were satisfied with teachers. Always they want to change the teacher because they thought that teachers didn't try their best to teach in the schools. This example shows that people knows about characteristics of a best teachers and when a teacher does not have the best traits they do not appreciate him or her
I conclusion, it is for the aforementioned reasons that I have come to believe that teachers in the past were more appreciated because they endured a lot of difficulties and also people could not compare them with best teachers of the time.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 533, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[1]
Message: The adverb 'Always' is usually not used at the beginning of a sentence.
...nts never were satisfied with teachers. Always they want to change the teacher because...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 607, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...cher because they thought that teachers didnt try their best to teach in the schools....
^^^^^
Line 3, column 715, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use 'the' with the superlative.
Suggestion: the
...t people knows about characteristics of a best teachers and when a teacher does n...
^
Line 4, column 211, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[4]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'with the best'.
Suggestion: with the best
... and also people could not compare them with best teachers of the time.
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, second, so, while, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 15.1003584229 139% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 52.0 43.0788530466 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 81.0 52.1666666667 155% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2286.0 1977.66487455 116% => OK
No of words: 482.0 407.700716846 118% => OK
Chars per words: 4.74273858921 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.68556276237 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75102795665 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 211.0 212.727598566 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.4377593361 0.524837075471 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 702.9 618.680645161 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 15.0 9.59856630824 156% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 67.9104291614 48.9658058833 139% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.25 100.406767564 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0833333333 20.6045352989 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.29166666667 5.45110844103 42% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.236089414692 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.076458572812 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0737576698707 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.150856017488 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0645574589148 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 11.7677419355 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 58.1214874552 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.21 10.9000537634 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.22 8.01818996416 90% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 86.8835125448 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.