TPO 41: Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Teacher were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they were nowadays. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
We are all aware that teachers play a critical role in educating people of all ages. Whereas some people think that people value teachers now more than ever, others disagree. I believe that people in our present time do not honor teachers the way they did in the past. I feel that way for two reasons, which I will explore in the following essay.
First, the unprecedented advancement in technology along with the advent of the internet has contributed to the availability of tremendous sources of education tools rather than teachers. For example, in the past, my father had to travel to England to have his degree in economics away from his family with the expensive cost of living in a foreign country. In contrast with the present time, my son is attending online certified courses over the internet that are held in the US without moving a bit away from Egypt. Not to mention, when he faces any problem comprehending any subject, he can watch as many as he wants youtube channels that will provide him with a comprehensive understanding without the need for any teachers. If it had not for the internet, learners would have valued educators as they have done in the past.
Second, teachers' career is not desirable anymore as in the past because teachers' wages are inferior to the other proficients. In other words, people do not consider teachers as successful people since most people consider a person's salary as a measure of success. For instance, in the past, educators had many sources to earn extra money by teaching in different schools and universities or providing tutoring to students, which enabled them to support a high-quality lifestyle. Currently, football players, TV entertainers, pharmacists, and many other jobs are more respectable and appealing to younger generations because of the uncertainty of the status quo of our present financial situation. As you can see, the low salary of teachers makes people don't give teachers the appreciation and gratitude that they deserve.
In conclusion, I believe that people in the past valued teachers more than now. It is not only because of the advent of technology that made the internet replaces teachers but also because of their low income of them that made their career the least preferable job.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 214, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...than teachers. For example, in the past, my father had to travel to England to ha...
^^
Line 3, column 363, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: contrast,
...cost of living in a foreign country. In contrast with the present time, my son is attend...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 225, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
...ful people since most people consider a persons salary as a measure of success. For ins...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 754, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...the low salary of teachers makes people dont give teachers the appreciation and grat...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, second, so, whereas, for example, for instance, i feel, in conclusion, in contrast, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 15.1003584229 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 13.8261648746 43% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 43.0788530466 84% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 52.1666666667 111% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1897.0 1977.66487455 96% => OK
No of words: 381.0 407.700716846 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.97900262467 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41805628031 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77064176633 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 212.727598566 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.530183727034 0.524837075471 101% => OK
syllable_count: 596.7 618.680645161 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.7505888784 48.9658058833 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.5625 100.406767564 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8125 20.6045352989 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.5 5.45110844103 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.169804226208 0.236089414692 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.063814403258 0.076458572812 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0499977867579 0.0737576698707 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.106257854606 0.150856017488 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0217175970575 0.0645574589148 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 11.7677419355 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 58.1214874552 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.9 10.9000537634 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.55 8.01818996416 107% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 86.8835125448 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 71.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.