According to the reading passage, power plants produce a waste and harmful material which is called coal ash in result of coal burning. As the coal ash can be harmful for the environment so, environmentalist suggest that the United States government should create new and much stricter regulations for handling and storing coal ash. The reading passage declares against this suggestion and explains the three acclaimed objections for that. However, the professor opposes them and gives a different view point on the handling and storing coal ash regulations.
First, the author mentions that the regulations exist. Even though the proposed objection seems logical but as the professor states that the using liner just for the new ponds and landfills cannot be sufficient entirely. She asserts the coal ash which is released in the old landfills and ponds can penetrate to the ground water and pollute it. So we can infer that the liner should be used in both of the old and new places.
Second, the professor sees the existing concerns about the general panic about using recycled coal ash in production of other staffs from a different view point. She discusses that although the companies concerns about the potential general panic but as the professor states the mercury also recycled and no one concern about that. Based on the professor statements, we can assume that the proposed concern is not logical and it's baseless.
Finally, the professor refutes the author's claim about the increasing cost problem. She argues although the new regulations induce an extra cost for the companies but the analytics have examined that the total extra cost is about 50 billion dollars. Therefore companies should increase the bill of electricity about 1 percent to recover they investments and it is really acceptable for the people.
In brief, the professors and the author give the contradicting ideas about the new regulations for handling and storing coal ash. The professor sheds light on the issue and explains that the new regulations can be much helpful for the environment and all the complaints claimed by the company holders are not logical.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 250, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...extra cost is about 50 billion dollars. Therefore companies should increase the bill of e...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, however, if, really, second, so, therefore, in brief
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 5.04856512141 178% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 7.30242825607 274% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 22.412803532 94% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 30.3222958057 86% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1802.0 1373.03311258 131% => OK
No of words: 351.0 270.72406181 130% => OK
Chars per words: 5.1339031339 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32839392791 4.04702891845 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63739812404 2.5805825403 102% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 145.348785872 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.492877492877 0.540411800872 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 536.4 419.366225166 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.1379271775 49.2860985944 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.625 110.228320801 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9375 21.698381199 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.9375 7.06452816374 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.511853297434 0.272083759551 188% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.170186987203 0.0996497079465 171% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.126160806558 0.0662205650399 191% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.280967452939 0.162205337803 173% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.117319771415 0.0443174109184 265% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.3589403974 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 53.8541721854 109% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 12.2367328918 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.55 8.42419426049 101% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 63.6247240618 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.