tpo 42
The rauthor enumerates some possible outcomes for the glass buliding that lead to some birds be injuried. The lecture, however, refutes aforementioned assertion by providing some counterclaims, and he firmly believes that the support are not compelling.
First, the reading claims that one of the way to prevent injuries to birds is using one-way glass insted of regular one. Nevertheless, the professor rejects the viewpoints by mentioning other aspects of this issue. In fact, when some one-way glass are utilized, it would lead to creat a surface like mirror that the bird can not undrestand the meaning of this object.
Second, the author asserts that using the colorful line is another option to solve this problems. On the contrary, the speaker opposes the point that when some lines are created on windows,we should use some hole or opening in other to have a good light condition inside. So, if we want to use hole, they should be so small becuse it should not be saw by bired. Hence, the inside the building will be so dark.
Third, according the reading we can benefit from some advantages of artificial magnetic field in other to help bied to fly in other way. Conversely,the professor concedes the statments since he thinks that the projection is incurrect. Given this issue,the magnetic field of bired help them in migration. For example when they want to go some warm place of some cold place, they will use of it. Although it have some benefit, they are not capable using it in short trip. Thus, the magnetic of buliding would not use for bireds.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-06 | Hrushikesh_Vaddoriya | 60 | view |
| 2022-08-21 | mmorteza | 80 | view |
| 2022-08-21 | mmorteza | 80 | view |
| 2021-11-14 | lutzuming | 80 | view |
| 2021-10-24 | Pariakarimi | 80 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following sentence? In the past, Young people depended too much on their parents to make a decision for them; today young people are better able to make a decision about their own life. 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?It is difficult for teacher to be both popular (like by student) and effective in helping student in learning 71
- tpo 3
- Do you agree or disagree with the following sentence? In the past, Young people depended too much on their parents to make a decision for them; today young people are better able to make a decision about their own life 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?It is difficult for teacher to be both popular (like by student) and effective in helping student in learning 71
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 84, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...olorful line is another option to solve this problems. On the contrary, the speaker ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 189, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , we
...t when some lines are created on windows,we should use some hole or opening in othe...
^^^
Line 4, column 29, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... so dark. Third, according the reading we can benefit from some advantages of a...
^^
Line 4, column 149, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , the
...elp bied to fly in other way. Conversely,the professor concedes the statments since ...
^^^^
Line 4, column 253, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , the
...rojection is incurrect. Given this issue,the magnetic field of bired help them in mi...
^^^^
Line 4, column 408, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'has'?
Suggestion: has
...place, they will use of it. Although it have some benefit, they are not capable usin...
^^^^
Line 4, column 502, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ort trip. Thus, the magnetic of buliding would not use for bireds.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, first, hence, however, if, nevertheless, second, so, third, thus, for example, in fact, in short, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 5.04856512141 178% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 7.30242825607 27% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 22.412803532 116% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 30.3222958057 115% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1300.0 1373.03311258 95% => OK
No of words: 267.0 270.72406181 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.86891385768 5.08290768461 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04229324003 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56749700055 2.5805825403 99% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 145.348785872 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.565543071161 0.540411800872 105% => OK
syllable_count: 404.1 419.366225166 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.1292217708 49.2860985944 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.6666666667 110.228320801 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8 21.698381199 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.33333333333 7.06452816374 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 4.19205298013 167% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 4.33554083885 208% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.275394093249 0.272083759551 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0905643503512 0.0996497079465 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0729035911184 0.0662205650399 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.163010712313 0.162205337803 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0722610965863 0.0443174109184 163% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 13.3589403974 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 53.8541721854 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.0289183223 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.67 12.2367328918 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.44 8.42419426049 100% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 63.6247240618 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.