tpo 42
The author enumerates some possible outcomes for the glass building that lead to some birds to be injured. The lecture, however, refutes the aforementioned assertion by providing some counterclaims, and he firmly believes that the supports are not compelling.
First, the reading claims that one of the ways to prevent of injuring of some birds is using one-way glass instead of a regular one. Nevertheless, the professor rejects the viewpoints by mentioning other aspects of this issue. In fact, when some one-way glass is utilized, it would lead to creating a surface like a mirror that the bird cannot understand the meaning of this object. For example, if the mirror reflexes of the sky and trees, the bird would think that they are real sky and trees.
Second, the author asserts that using the colorful line is another option to solve these problems with glass building. On the contrary, the speaker opposes the point that when some lines are created on windows, we should use some hole or opening in other to have a good light condition inside. So, if we want to use the hole, they should be so small because it should not saw by birds. Hence, the inside of the building will be so dark.
Third, according to the reading, we can benefit from some advantages of the artificial magnetic field in other to help the bird to fly in another way. Conversely, the professor concedes the statements since he thinks that the projection is incorrect. Given this issue, the magnetic field of bird helps them in migration. For example, when they want to go to some warm places because the weather is cold, they will use it. Although it has some benefit, they are not capable of using in short trip. Thus, the magnetic of the building would not use for birds.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, first, hence, however, if, nevertheless, second, so, third, thus, for example, in fact, in short, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 5.04856512141 198% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 22.412803532 120% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 30.3222958057 132% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1450.0 1373.03311258 106% => OK
No of words: 306.0 270.72406181 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.7385620915 5.08290768461 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18244613648 4.04702891845 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48513887867 2.5805825403 96% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 145.348785872 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.519607843137 0.540411800872 96% => OK
syllable_count: 442.8 419.366225166 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.25165562914 399% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.4081117119 49.2860985944 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.625 110.228320801 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.125 21.698381199 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.8125 7.06452816374 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 4.33554083885 208% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.335079524403 0.272083759551 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.111956243465 0.0996497079465 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0763558487998 0.0662205650399 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.197138885838 0.162205337803 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0671966500242 0.0443174109184 152% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 13.3589403974 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 53.8541721854 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 11.0289183223 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.21 12.2367328918 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.83 8.42419426049 93% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 63.6247240618 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.