TPO 42 integrated Writing
The reading and the listening materials have a debate on proposed solutions to prevent birds to crash into glass of buildingns. The penman puts forwars 3 main theories that are disapproved by the following orator.
First of all, the writer suggests that usage of one way glasses can resolve the problem. By using this type of material people inside of the building can see out but, birds cannot see inside of the place. However, the speaker views this issue from different angle, according to him, one side glass reflects the image same as a mirror. Hence, birds look at the reflected sky image inside of the mirror and fly into that.
The second point offered by the author is that, making colorful lines and new design on the surface of the glass. The text mentions that by painting some parts of the glass light can go into the building also. Converesly, the lecturer cast doubt on this assumption by saying that birds see the glass as a surface with many holes. On the other hand, if the holes being extremly small there is no light for the room.
Third, the reading passage prposes that a building can be an artificial magnetic field due to helping birds to find their path. Albeit, the professor holds a different prespective by saying that birds using their magnetic system only for long distances and in short distances they are able to see by their eyes.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 205, Rule ID: ALSO_SENT_END[1]
Message: 'Also' is not used at the end of the sentence. Use 'as well' instead.
Suggestion: as well
...he glass light can go into the building also. Converesly, the lecturer cast doubt on...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, however, if, look, second, so, third, in short, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.4613686534 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 22.412803532 71% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 30.3222958057 112% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 5.01324503311 20% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1129.0 1373.03311258 82% => OK
No of words: 241.0 270.72406181 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.6846473029 5.08290768461 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94007293032 4.04702891845 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.2692429751 2.5805825403 88% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 145.348785872 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.597510373444 0.540411800872 111% => OK
syllable_count: 337.5 419.366225166 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.3844795865 49.2860985944 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 94.0833333333 110.228320801 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0833333333 21.698381199 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.66666666667 7.06452816374 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.27373068433 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.435104025398 0.272083759551 160% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.136607945968 0.0996497079465 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0610224135539 0.0662205650399 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.226097642494 0.162205337803 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0505029194502 0.0443174109184 114% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 13.3589403974 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 53.8541721854 126% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.0289183223 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.86 12.2367328918 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.77 8.42419426049 92% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 63.6247240618 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.7273730684 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 71.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.