The reading and lecture both discuss the solution of preventing the birds from getting hurt from the architecture glass. While the reading provides three solutions to protect the birds from the art glass, the professor refutes, saying none of these claims are convincing.
Firstly, the reading states that we should make the architecture glass transparent from one side and none transparent from the other side, so we can prevent the birds from hitting the glass. On the other hand, the professor refutes this idea by saying that the one way transparent glass has a problem which is the glass works as a mirror. In addition, this mirror will be bad as regular glass. This is because the birds can not understand that. Furthermore, this mirror will reflect the trees and sky pictures. So, many birds will get hurt.
In addition, the article avers that the architectures should make colorful painting to give chance for birds to avoid the glass. However, the professor question this notion by pointing out that the colorful glass has a problem like regular glass. This is because people inside can see outside, but birds will think that glass has an open hall and they can go through them. Moreover, the painting glass should be extremely small. Consequently, it will get it dark for people inside.
Finally, the reading mentions that we might have magnetic field to help birds get away from glass through their natural magnetic navigation ability. Nevertheless, the professor rejects this idea by explaining that birds have earth navigation ability, but they use this ability for long distance. For example, birds use magnetic ability to navigate form cold country to warm country in winter season. On the other hand, birds can not use this ability to navigate in small city or for short trip. In fact, they use their eyes to navigate inside the cities. So, magnetic field ability does not have this much effect in small areas.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, finally, first, firstly, furthermore, however, moreover, nevertheless, so, while, for example, in addition, in fact, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.4613686534 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 5.04856512141 277% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 30.0 22.412803532 134% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 30.3222958057 119% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1614.0 1373.03311258 118% => OK
No of words: 324.0 270.72406181 120% => OK
Chars per words: 4.98148148148 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24264068712 4.04702891845 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4041922183 2.5805825403 93% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 145.348785872 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.487654320988 0.540411800872 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 475.2 419.366225166 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 13.0662251656 145% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.1240382096 49.2860985944 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.9473684211 110.228320801 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0526315789 21.698381199 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.05263157895 7.06452816374 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 4.33554083885 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.488308573693 0.272083759551 179% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.161247085892 0.0996497079465 162% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0720533553245 0.0662205650399 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.307896618143 0.162205337803 190% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0646796023509 0.0443174109184 146% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 13.3589403974 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 53.8541721854 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.0289183223 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 12.2367328918 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.16 8.42419426049 85% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 63.6247240618 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.7273730684 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.