TPO 43
The reading passage lists three hypotheses about what agnostides ate and how they behaved, while the professor in the lecture says that each of three theories has strong weaknesses.
The first point the professor argues is that if the agnostides could not be free-swimming predators because they did not have a good vision. All types of swimming predators would have large developed eyes to spot prays. Also, there is no evidence that agnostids have other special organs to help them pray, which ruins the claim in the reading that they were swimming predators.
Secondly, the reading holds the view that agnostids might be the scavengers ling on the seafloor like examples of other types of primitive arthropods. The professor, however, mentions that agnostids had abilities which the animals who are seafloor dwellers do not have. They could move fast and far in multiple large habitats, while the typical creatures living on the seafloor cannot occupy such big areas. That is, the professor fights against the view in the reading again.
Finally, the professor represents his view that agnostids were not parasites due to their huge population. Parasites have limited number of the population because they have to prevent to kill off their host. The vast amount of agnostids have been found in the same places ruins contradicts the suggestion in the reading that the agnostids might have live on others creatures.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 66, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'scavengers'' or 'scavenger's'?
Suggestion: scavengers'; scavenger's
...ds the view that agnostids might be the scavengers ling on the seafloor like examples of o...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 77, Rule ID: LING[1]
Message: Did you mean 'long'?
Suggestion: long
... that agnostids might be the scavengers ling on the seafloor like examples of other ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 232, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
...nostids had abilities which the animals who are seafloor dwellers do not have. They cou...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, however, if, second, secondly, so, well, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 7.30242825607 27% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 22.412803532 80% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 30.3222958057 79% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1197.0 1373.03311258 87% => OK
No of words: 231.0 270.72406181 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.18181818182 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89854898053 4.04702891845 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51971109163 2.5805825403 98% => OK
Unique words: 134.0 145.348785872 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.580086580087 0.540411800872 107% => OK
syllable_count: 355.5 419.366225166 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.908617421 49.2860985944 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.818181818 110.228320801 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 21.698381199 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.18181818182 7.06452816374 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.424730646923 0.272083759551 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.161140664697 0.0996497079465 162% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0791210668003 0.0662205650399 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.253834924244 0.162205337803 156% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0704787439505 0.0443174109184 159% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.3589403974 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 53.8541721854 109% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 12.2367328918 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.23 8.42419426049 98% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 63.6247240618 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.