Human activities have negative effects on plant and animal species. Some people think it is too late to do anything about this problem. Other believe effective measures can be taken to improve this situation. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
It has been argued that human beings need to be responsible for the distinction of some plant and animal species, so we need to take actions immediately. However, many people think it is helpless to make a difference. To my mind, I strongly believe that there are numerous ways to protect the Earth and help other creatures.
To begin with, it is undeniable that it is extremely hard to make a change because a large number of species has been extinct. For instance, even with the most advanced technology, scientists still cannot make a mammoth alive or save a dying out animal. For those species which are disappeared, human beings have limited things can do. However, people can converse the animals and plants which are alive now, slow down the distinction process and in the end, keep the biodiversity.
Accordingly, I am optimistic, and I would argue that governments and individuals can take advantage of various measures to improve the situation effectively. First of all, governments need to conduct laws to regulate human activities that may damage habitats where rare plants and animals live. Nation parks are a haven for local species and should not be touch by the industrious or agricultural business. Secondly, countries across the world can work together, for example under the Paris Agreement, to reduce the carbon emission and to protect the environment for all the creatures. Finally, individuals can also take responsibility to take care of the environment, to save energy so that to help other species on the planet.
In conclusion, although human behaviours have conducted a detrimental impact on other creatures, people can improve this situation by becoming more environmentally friendly. I think the Earth would remain the rich diversity due to effective human actions.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 84, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...extremely hard to make a change because a large number of species has been extinct. For instance,...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 483, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... and in the end, keep the biodiversity. Accordingly, I am optimistic, and I woul...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, finally, first, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, still, for example, for instance, i think, in conclusion, first of all, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1514.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 292.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.18493150685 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13376432452 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93568067995 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.585616438356 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 478.8 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.7533067163 49.4020404114 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.142857143 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8571428571 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.4285714286 7.06120827912 162% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.262915914662 0.244688304435 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0824793908207 0.084324248473 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0551773259805 0.0667982634062 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.159111080343 0.151304729494 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0489022544148 0.056905535591 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.68 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.