The diagrams below show how houses can be protected in areas which are prone to flooding.
The pictures compare two different measures can be taken to protect houses from being damaged in flooding areas.
We can see that a stopbank in the first diagram that can stop flood under a century-year level while in the second one there is higher frames under houses but no stopbank between houses and the river. It is necessary for both designs to keep a gap between the building and the water surface.
The most noticeable difference between two images is there is a stopbank, making of a berm and floodgate, in the first one to create an internal ponding between the drain and the house. With the obstacle, the water which is under the level of once 100 years from the river cannot reach the house. Even though rainwater may come from the internal run, it still can leave 300 mm freeboard between the house floor and the ponding level.
If there is no stopbank, the house needs more space from the ground level to the floor level. In the second diagram, the house is in the middle of the water path linking from the internal area to the river. To protect the house from 100-year lever flood, higher frames will be installed.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 120, Rule ID: THERE_S_MANY[4]
Message: Did you mean 'there are higher frames'?
Suggestion: there are higher frames
...tury-year level while in the second one there is higher frames under houses but no stopbank between ho...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, may, second, still, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 1.00243902439 698% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 938.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 203.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.62068965517 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77462671648 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.20858925232 2.65546596893 83% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.51724137931 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 277.2 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.6898469463 43.030603864 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.222222222 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5555555556 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.55555555556 5.23603664747 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.238498701506 0.215688989381 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106879930036 0.103423049105 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0922543379855 0.0843802449381 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.172876190301 0.15604864568 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0791705593658 0.0819641961636 97% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.81 11.4140731707 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.14 8.06136585366 89% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.