17. Human activities have negative effects on plant and animal species. Some people think it is too late to do anything about this problem. Other believe effective measures can be taken to improve this situation. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
It has been argued that human beings need to be responsible for the distinction of some plant and animal species, so we need to take actions immediately. However, many people think it is helpless to make a difference. To my mind, I strongly believe that there are numerous methods that can protect Earth and help other creatures.
To begin with, it is undeniable that it is extremely hard to make a change because a large number of species has been extinct. For instance, even with the most advanced technology, scientists still cannot make a mammoth alive or save a died-out animal. The fact is that, for those species which are disappeared, human beings have limited things can do. However, people can converse protect the animals and plants which still exist now, slow down the distinction process and in the end, maintain the biodiversity.
Accordingly, I am optimistic, and I would argue that governments and individuals can apply various measures to improve the situation effectively. First of all, governments need to enact laws to regulate human activities that may damage habitats where rare/endangered plants and animals live. National parks are a heaven haven for local species and should not be touch by the industrious industry or agriculture. Secondly, countries across the world can work coordinately, for example under the Paris Agreement, to reduce carbon emission and to protect the environment for all the creatures. Finally, individuals can also take responsibility to take care of the environment and to save energy so that to help other species on the planet.
In conclusion, although human behaviours have conducted exerted a detrimental impact on other creatures, people can improve this situation by becoming more environmentally friendly. I think the Earth would remain rich in diversity due to effective human actions.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 84, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...extremely hard to make a change because a large number of species has been extinct. For instance,...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 514, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... in the end, maintain the biodiversity. Accordingly, I am optimistic, and I woul...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, finally, first, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, still, for example, for instance, i think, in conclusion, first of all, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1561.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 296.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.27364864865 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98862395993 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.587837837838 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 489.6 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.1847795207 49.4020404114 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.5 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1428571429 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.4285714286 7.06120827912 162% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.259223964931 0.244688304435 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0807498795959 0.084324248473 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0513406853941 0.0667982634062 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.1581056989 0.151304729494 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0465980000357 0.056905535591 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.95 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.