The reading passage explores the issue of what agnostids ate or how they behaved and gives us three theories about it, the professor's lecture deals with the same issue, however, she thinks that all the three speculations have weaknesses, and she uses three specific reasons to support her idea.
First, even though the reading suggest that agnostids can be free-swimming predators, since they are related to arthropods and other types of arthropods were good at swimming. The professor argues in the lecture that most swimming predators have large eyes, this is because predators needs good vision to see preys. However, agnostids are animals with tiny eyes or even blind, and there are not other evidence proving that agnostids have other ability to detect preys, so that agnostids are unlikely to be free-swimming predators.
Moreover, contrary to the statement of the reading that agnostids may lived on the seafloor and ate dead organisms, the professor contends that agnostids are not living this way, it is the fact that seafloor animals usually do not move fast and they like occupying an area, whereas there are evidences showing that agnostids are able to move at a high speed, because researchers find their fossils within in a long distance.
Finally, the author of the reading claims that agnostids are parasites, but the professor proves this claim is indefensible by pointing out that parasites can not have large population, because organisms will be killed by parasites living on them if the population of parasites is too much. But scientists find lots of fossils of agnostids, in other words, the population of agnostids are very large, as a consequence, agnostids are not likely to be parasites.
Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'finally', 'first', 'however', 'if', 'may', 'moreover', 'so', 'whereas', 'in other words']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.239482200647 0.261695866417 92% => OK
Verbs: 0.181229773463 0.158904122519 114% => OK
Adjectives: 0.084142394822 0.0723426182421 116% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0517799352751 0.0435111971325 119% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0355987055016 0.0277247811725 128% => OK
Prepositions: 0.129449838188 0.128828473217 100% => OK
Participles: 0.0323624595469 0.0370669169778 87% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.69546103739 2.5805825403 104% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0258899676375 0.0208969081088 124% => OK
Particles: 0.00323624595469 0.00154638098197 209% => OK
Determiners: 0.084142394822 0.128158765124 66% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0129449838188 0.0158828679856 82% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00647249190939 0.0114777025283 56% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1720.0 1645.83664459 105% => OK
No of words: 280.0 271.125827815 103% => OK
Chars per words: 6.14285714286 6.08160592843 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09062348924 4.04852973271 101% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.375 0.374372842146 100% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.3 0.287516216867 104% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.214285714286 0.187439937562 114% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.164285714286 0.113142543107 145% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69546103739 2.5805825403 104% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 145.348785872 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.553571428571 0.539623497131 103% => OK
Word variations: 56.4613767556 53.8517498576 105% => OK
How many sentences: 7.0 13.0529801325 54% => OK
Sentence length: 40.0 21.7502111507 184% => Sentence lengths are too long.
Sentence length SD: 92.0603174056 49.3711431718 186% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 245.714285714 132.220823453 186% => Less chars per sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 40.0 21.7502111507 184% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 1.42857142857 0.878197800319 163% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 3.39072847682 0% => OK
Readability: 70.0 50.5018328374 139% => OK
Elegance: 1.49397590361 1.90840788429 78% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.670711606436 0.549887131256 122% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.230652007612 0.142949733639 161% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0670332546336 0.0787303798458 85% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.796542035112 0.631733273073 126% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.157075379396 0.139662658121 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.3596108681 0.266732575781 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.074961128644 0.103435571967 72% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.319700317602 0.414875509568 77% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0780130545874 0.0530846634433 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.4403194654 0.40443939384 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0761703335271 0.0528353158467 144% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.26048565121 23% => More neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 3.0 3.49668874172 86% => OK
Negative topic words: 3.0 3.62251655629 83% => OK
Neutral topic words: 1.0 3.1766004415 31% => OK
Total topic words: 7.0 10.2958057395 68% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.