Tpo 44
The reading passage argues the belief about a coin which found on a site in the United stated that European explorers as Norse, arrived with themselves when traveled across North Atlantic. However, the reading uses three points to more clarification the argument, the professor repudiates every mentioned point in the reading part.
First of all, the professor rejects the first point which mentions to distances between Maine and Norse’s other site which makes it impossible to create a relationship between found coin with Norse. Because the Norse traveled to far land even longer than mentioned distances in the reading base on the evidence. As a result, repudiation the coin’s value due to distances seems illogical.
As a second reason, the lack of other coins organizes the second point in the reading to argue the scientific evidence. The professor casts doubt about lack of evidence due to scientific achievements which refer to other valuable objects that found in some places. Plus, it is possible to imagine that the Norse when decided to back they packed up everything except one coin. Consequently, scientific evidence confirms the relationship between coin and Norse.
Thirdly, the passage explains to fruitless of the Norse coins to Native Americans as third reasons. In the lecturer’s opinion, the Norse coins were valuables object even if they couldn’t utilize as money. In fact, some evidence mentions to other valuable objects like necklace were common among Native Americans. So, coins as an alluring object could be useful for beckoning the natives.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 206, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...tionship between found coin with Norse. Because the Norse traveled to far land even lon...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 400, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ld be useful for beckoning the natives.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, however, if, second, so, third, thirdly, in fact, as a result, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 10.4613686534 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 7.30242825607 27% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 8.0 22.412803532 36% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 30.3222958057 125% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.01324503311 160% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1349.0 1373.03311258 98% => OK
No of words: 251.0 270.72406181 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.37450199203 5.08290768461 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98032404683 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76950608695 2.5805825403 107% => OK
Unique words: 137.0 145.348785872 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.545816733068 0.540411800872 101% => OK
syllable_count: 418.5 419.366225166 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.6744070523 49.2860985944 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.769230769 110.228320801 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3076923077 21.698381199 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.38461538462 7.06452816374 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.338189325337 0.272083759551 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.127625816057 0.0996497079465 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0643225810993 0.0662205650399 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.207164024082 0.162205337803 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0323137545329 0.0443174109184 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.3589403974 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 53.8541721854 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.0289183223 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 12.2367328918 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.42 8.42419426049 100% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 63.6247240618 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.7273730684 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.