TPO 44
The reading states that the discovered coin in the Native American site is a fake and provides three reasons of support. However, the professor explains the coin is not a fake necessarily and refutes each of the author’s point.
First, the reading states that the discovery is found in a great distance from Norse settlement, which reveals the coin is a fake. The professor refutes this point by saying that North Native American would travel over long distances, and would obtain valuable objects. It is probable that they could have reached the Norse and obtained the coin originally from them.
Second, the article claims that since there are no other coins have been found, the discovered coin is a fake. However, the professor contends that it is not necessary true. The Norse, who traveled to the Native North American site, in their way back to Europe packed up their valuable objects as well as their coins.
Third, the author states that coins did not have any use for the North American settlement. The lecture apposes this point by stating that it is true that the North Native American did not use coin, but they were interested in valuable object. The Norse knew the fact that the American settlement probably found the coins valuable for their beauty. For example, they could have used the coins in necklaces. Therefore, it is probable that the Norse use coins to trade with them.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, second, so, therefore, third, well, for example, as well as, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 22.412803532 116% => OK
Preposition: 18.0 30.3222958057 59% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1172.0 1373.03311258 85% => OK
No of words: 239.0 270.72406181 88% => OK
Chars per words: 4.90376569038 5.08290768461 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.93187294222 4.04702891845 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.34767931931 2.5805825403 91% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 145.348785872 80% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.489539748954 0.540411800872 91% => OK
syllable_count: 358.2 419.366225166 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.116997792494 855% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.3142532531 49.2860985944 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 90.1538461538 110.228320801 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3846153846 21.698381199 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.07692307692 7.06452816374 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.515990347298 0.272083759551 190% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.20481704551 0.0996497079465 206% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0873385185164 0.0662205650399 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.328405731172 0.162205337803 202% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0477837267398 0.0443174109184 108% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.3589403974 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 53.8541721854 115% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.0289183223 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.14 12.2367328918 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.3 8.42419426049 87% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 63.6247240618 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.7273730684 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.