In the reading, the author claims that there are some archaeological that believe the European silver coin which public believe that as an original in the United States, is fake by pointing out 3 reasons of support, However, finding all the ideas questionable and implausible, the lecturer totally repudiate this claim and presents some evidence to the contrary.
At first, the author argues that there is a great distance between Norse settlement in Canada and Europe is too far away and it's about 1000 km thus it seems that this transport didn't happen. Conversely, the lecturer brings up the idea that many other objects found by transportation in this distance and it can be one of them.
In addition, the reading passage holds the view that there are no other coins and it shows that the Norse didn't bring any silver coins. On the other hand, the lecturer disputes this point by clarifying the fact that it does not necessarily mean that this coin didn't transport to North America and it can just because of packing others but forgot to do it for this one.
Finally, the author asserts that the Norse knew that there isn't any application of this coin in North America as the last point for supporting the fake coin. The lecturer, though, dismisses it by elucidating that by this knowledge, there was some chance for using the coin as a neckless or other kinds of jewelry in North America. That being said that it can be transported for this kind of use.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 178, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...00 km thus it seems that this transport didnt happen. Conversely, the lecturer brings...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 107, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...other coins and it shows that the Norse didnt bring any silver coins. On the other ha...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 261, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...oes not necessarily mean that this coin didnt transport to North America and it can j...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 60, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: isn't
... asserts that the Norse knew that there isnt any application of this coin in North A...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, conversely, finally, first, however, if, so, thus, in addition, kind of, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 12.0772626932 132% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 22.412803532 152% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 27.0 30.3222958057 89% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1211.0 1373.03311258 88% => OK
No of words: 256.0 270.72406181 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.73046875 5.08290768461 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47437736309 2.5805825403 96% => OK
Unique words: 141.0 145.348785872 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.55078125 0.540411800872 102% => OK
syllable_count: 366.3 419.366225166 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 13.0662251656 61% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 32.0 21.2450331126 151% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 82.1742622419 49.2860985944 167% => OK
Chars per sentence: 151.375 110.228320801 137% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.0 21.698381199 147% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.875 7.06452816374 168% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.30293194462 0.272083759551 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.13999999893 0.0996497079465 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0651607080926 0.0662205650399 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.181464941439 0.162205337803 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0431690642206 0.0443174109184 97% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 13.3589403974 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.92 53.8541721854 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.0289183223 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.75 12.2367328918 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.18 8.42419426049 97% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 63.6247240618 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 18.5 10.7273730684 172% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 10.498013245 141% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.