The reading and the listening passages are both about silver coins that were discovered at a Native American archeological site in the state of Maine in the United States. While the reading passage provides three main reasons why some archeological believe that the coin is not genuine, the professor contends that the coin is not fake and provides three reasons for that.
First of all, the article states that there Maine is very far away from the Norse in Canada. On the other hand, the professor says that the native American traveled a great distance and brought many objects with them. Also, they could bring the silver coin with them.
Secondly, the author mentions that there are no other coins that have been found, which suggest that they did not bring with them coins. The lecturer responds to this by saying it is not necessarily that they settle on. They might back up all the valuable object and took them back to Europe.
Finally, the reading passage mentions that the Norse understood that the coins were useless. Also, they did not recognize as money. The professor challenges this point by stating that it is true that they might view it as money, but the Norse value other objects such as jewelry. Also, he mentioned necklace which they used it to trade.
To conclude, the professor responds to all reasons that the reading passage mentioned.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 250, Rule ID: BELIEVE_BELIEF[1]
Message: Did you mean 'belief' (noun) instead of believe (verb)?
Suggestion: belief
...ree main reasons why some archeological believe that the coin is not genuine, the profe...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 294, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...le object and took them back to Europe. Finally, the reading passage mentions th...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, second, secondly, so, while, such as, first of all, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 12.0772626932 141% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 22.412803532 147% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 21.0 30.3222958057 69% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 5.01324503311 20% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1140.0 1373.03311258 83% => OK
No of words: 234.0 270.72406181 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.87179487179 5.08290768461 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91114542567 4.04702891845 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.25221378742 2.5805825403 87% => OK
Unique words: 123.0 145.348785872 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.525641025641 0.540411800872 97% => OK
syllable_count: 341.1 419.366225166 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 47.0508977837 49.2860985944 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.6923076923 110.228320801 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 21.698381199 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.30769230769 7.06452816374 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.378475243192 0.272083759551 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.12956113618 0.0996497079465 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.101274193769 0.0662205650399 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.191705938011 0.162205337803 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.115234627101 0.0443174109184 260% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 13.3589403974 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 53.8541721854 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.0289183223 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.67 12.2367328918 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.36 8.42419426049 87% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 63.6247240618 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.7273730684 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 71.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.