The reading passage and the lecture are both about whether the coin is a genuine historical record or not. The reading passage states that the coin which was discovered in the state of Maine in the United States is historical fake and brings three reasons to support this idea. The lecturer casts doubt on the reading’s standpoint and refutes it by providing three reasons.
Firstly, the reading passage believes that Norse brought the coin to the north of America and then native American explored the coin; but, Maine was far from the other sits which Norse settled such as Canada; therefore, the coin was not a real connection between settlements. The lecturer refutes this point. She says that native American traveled long distances. Also, they always brought back many other important things. Maybe, they brought back the coin to Maine when they traveled to the Norse settlements.
Secondly, the reading passage says that there were not any other coins in Canadian settlements. Hence, the Norse did not bring silver coins to their North American settlements. On the other hand, the lecturer believes that the Norse always packed their important materials. presumably, they might pack their all coins to bring back them to Europe.
Finally, the reading passage states that silver coins were useless for the Norse who lived in North American settlements; because American people did not use coins such as money. In contrast, the lecturer challenges this point. She believes that the Norse understood the importance of the coins. They used the coins as a jewelry in neckless construction; and also, they trade the coins as an important commercial material.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 279, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ngs three reasons to support this idea. The lecturer casts doubt on the reading&apo...
^^^
Line 5, column 275, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Presumably
...lways packed their important materials. presumably, they might pack their all coins to bri...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, firstly, hence, may, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, in contrast, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 22.412803532 103% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 30.3222958057 73% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1403.0 1373.03311258 102% => OK
No of words: 271.0 270.72406181 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.17712177122 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05734859645 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51138934232 2.5805825403 97% => OK
Unique words: 130.0 145.348785872 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.479704797048 0.540411800872 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 415.8 419.366225166 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 3.25607064018 215% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 21.2450331126 75% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 59.0242270174 49.2860985944 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.6875 110.228320801 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.9375 21.698381199 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.875 7.06452816374 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.27373068433 187% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.460685843036 0.272083759551 169% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.158391486749 0.0996497079465 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.127350437037 0.0662205650399 192% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.310478856182 0.162205337803 191% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0858732617066 0.0443174109184 194% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.3589403974 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 53.8541721854 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 11.0289183223 76% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 12.2367328918 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.29 8.42419426049 87% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 63.6247240618 77% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.7273730684 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.498013245 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.