The reading is about origin of silver coin discovered in historical site in the United State. Its states provided three theories about the coin was fake and not brought by Norse to America. Conversely, in the lecture, the professor holds a totally different view that there are logical evidences that mean coin originally brought by European, and points to inaccuracies in each of the author's reasons.
First of all, the article claims that distance between Native American site and location of coin is too long. The professor refutes this point by saying many other objects also founded there. According to her, Native Americans traveled a lot and they could reach there. As a result location of coin seems to be rational.
Furthermore, the reading posits that no other coins have been founded at the Canadian site. However, the professor says it doesn’t mean Norse did not bring any other coins. She also states that may be they brought coins and then return them back to Europe.
Eventually, the article asserts that coins would seem to be useless for Native Americans. The professor on the other hand explains that also they might not recognize it as a money like today, they valued unusual things. The coins still were beautiful and could be used as necklace. Therefore, the Norse can utilize the coin trade with the Native Americans.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 271, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...veled a lot and they could reach there. As a result location of coin seems to be r...
^^
Line 5, column 195, Rule ID: MAY_BE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'maybe' (=perhaps)?
Suggestion: maybe
...g any other coins. She also states that may be they brought coins and then return them...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 173, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[1]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'money'.
Suggestion: money
...hat also they might not recognize it as a money like today, they valued unusual things....
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, conversely, first, furthermore, however, if, may, so, still, then, therefore, as a result, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 12.0772626932 58% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 22.412803532 80% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 30.3222958057 82% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1127.0 1373.03311258 82% => OK
No of words: 226.0 270.72406181 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.98672566372 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.87727950738 4.04702891845 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.40916505837 2.5805825403 93% => OK
Unique words: 135.0 145.348785872 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.597345132743 0.540411800872 111% => OK
syllable_count: 349.2 419.366225166 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 21.2450331126 75% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.1456729702 49.2860985944 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 80.5 110.228320801 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.1428571429 21.698381199 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.14285714286 7.06452816374 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.27373068433 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.467776956025 0.272083759551 172% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.161917576877 0.0996497079465 162% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0850976709861 0.0662205650399 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.278926808709 0.162205337803 172% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0350475556835 0.0443174109184 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 13.3589403974 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 53.8541721854 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 11.0289183223 76% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.37 12.2367328918 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.71 8.42419426049 92% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 63.6247240618 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.7273730684 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.498013245 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 71.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.