TPO 44
Question: Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they challenge the specific theories presented in the reading passage.
European silver coin
The reading and the listening materials have a debate on being original the discovered silver coin at the main. The penman puts forward 3 main hypothesizes, which are refuted by the following orator.
First of all, the writer suggests that the coin is founded in far distance from canada and this means that someone may misguide the scientists. On the contrary, the speaker views this issue from an opposite angle. According to her, archeologists have discovered many other objects rather than the coin in far distances, it may be because of Norse's interest for travelling.
The second point offered by the author is that only one coin is detected in this area and 1000 km distance between this coin and the canadians reveal no relationship between them. On the other hand, the lecturer casts doubt on this assumption by saying that Norse were not permanent settlement and they may return the coins back to European with themselves.
Last, the reading passage proposes that there were no logical usage for Americans of a coin from a foreign country. However, the professor holds a different perspective. She explains that The Americans valued attractive and unusual objects. As a result Europeans may trade with them.
In all, the ideas mentioned in the speech counter the opinions in the text in that
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 13, column 243, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... valued attractive and unusual objects. As a result Europeans may trade with them....
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, may, second, so, as a result, first of all, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 22.412803532 85% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 30.3222958057 92% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1104.0 1373.03311258 80% => OK
No of words: 218.0 270.72406181 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.06422018349 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84250218741 4.04702891845 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6244626225 2.5805825403 102% => OK
Unique words: 135.0 145.348785872 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.619266055046 0.540411800872 115% => OK
syllable_count: 329.4 419.366225166 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 45.6797426535 49.2860985944 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.0 110.228320801 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1666666667 21.698381199 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.16666666667 7.06452816374 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.389882313856 0.272083759551 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.115405760832 0.0996497079465 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.091395337152 0.0662205650399 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.174104195917 0.162205337803 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.093974523324 0.0443174109184 212% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.3589403974 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 53.8541721854 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.0289183223 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.77 12.2367328918 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.66 8.42419426049 103% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 63.6247240618 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.