tpo-45
In the reading, the author presents some arguments that cast doubt on the theory which states bees have existed on Earth from 200 million years ago. This theory is supported by the excavation of very old fossil structures which is similar to bee nests. However, finding all the arguments unconvincing and implausible, the lecturer repudiates the author's claim and corroborates the theory by presenting some shreds of evidence.
At first, the author argues that no fossils of actual bees are found that they date before 100 million years ago. Conversely, the lecturer brings up the idea that it is true that no fossils of bees were found from that time, probably it is because in the time trees with resins were rare. Owing to the fact that bees could be preserved in resins secreted by trees and this kind of trees was scarce at that time or the condition was not suitable, the bees did not have a chance to be preserved.
In addition, the reading passage holds the view that the absence of flowering plant which are only sourced of bees' food is another reason that states bees could not have existed 200 million years ago. That being said, the lecturer disputes it by clarifying the fact that those early bees may have been fed on non-flowering plants such as fern or pine trees.Moreover, it is likely that after the evolution of flowering plants, bees adapted to this kind of plant and kept a mutual close association with flowering plants ever since.
Finally, the author draws attention to the structures that are bereft of some details which are necessary for bees' nest as the last point in refuting the theory. Yet again, the lecturer dismisses it by pointing out that there is some chemical evidence which validates the theory. For example, those early bees used some waterproofing material in order to isolate their nest from water that modern bees use them too.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 357, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Moreover
...ering plants such as fern or pine trees.Moreover, it is likely that after the evolution ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, finally, first, however, if, may, moreover, so, for example, in addition, kind of, such as, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 10.4613686534 182% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 21.0 12.0772626932 174% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 22.412803532 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 30.3222958057 139% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.01324503311 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1553.0 1373.03311258 113% => OK
No of words: 323.0 270.72406181 119% => OK
Chars per words: 4.8080495356 5.08290768461 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23936324884 4.04702891845 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44748542301 2.5805825403 95% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 145.348785872 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.520123839009 0.540411800872 96% => OK
syllable_count: 472.5 419.366225166 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 21.2450331126 137% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 60.0633274618 49.2860985944 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.181818182 110.228320801 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.3636363636 21.698381199 135% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.3636363636 7.06452816374 147% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.115446462882 0.272083759551 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0488500622108 0.0996497079465 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0176122606181 0.0662205650399 27% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.072749665958 0.162205337803 45% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.010184833705 0.0443174109184 23% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.3589403974 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.5 53.8541721854 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.0289183223 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.21 12.2367328918 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.2 8.42419426049 97% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 63.6247240618 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.498013245 130% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.