Tpo 45
The reading passage presents three reasons to debunk that bees were existed on earth as early as 200 million syears ago. But the professor in the lecture support the idea of existence of bees since that time.
First, the reading contends that there is no fossil record of bees that date to 200 million years ago. By contrast, the professor argues that even though there no fossil record of bees, it does not mean they did not exist at that time. In fact, the remants of bees could not be preserved in the environment. The specific kinds of trees which typically host bees were so rare at that time and after the trees became abundant, bees coud fossilize in the environment.
Second, the reading contends that since there was no flowering plant 200 million years ago, the existence of bees is doubtful. On the contrary, the professor believes that bees fed on non-flowering plants at that time and the adaptation of feeding on flowering plant later evolved in bees. So, it proves that bees existed in the mentioned time.
Third, the reading believes that since structure of nest chambers are similar to modern bees, such as spiral pattern of caps, there was no bees at such an old time. However, the professor believes that although the early bees did not the structures, they may have water proof structures in their nest, just as the modern bees do have.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 264, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled as one.
Suggestion: waterproof
...s did not the structures, they may have water proof structures in their nest, just as the m...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, may, second, so, third, in fact, such as, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 7.30242825607 41% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 14.0 12.0772626932 116% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 22.412803532 80% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 30.3222958057 109% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1122.0 1373.03311258 82% => OK
No of words: 238.0 270.72406181 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.71428571429 5.08290768461 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.92775363542 4.04702891845 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.33262537977 2.5805825403 90% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 145.348785872 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.540411800872 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 332.1 419.366225166 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.7779506289 49.2860985944 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.0 110.228320801 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6363636364 21.698381199 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.45454545455 7.06452816374 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 4.33554083885 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0735507351813 0.272083759551 27% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.036540949053 0.0996497079465 37% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0177018715825 0.0662205650399 27% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0528405401865 0.162205337803 33% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00868787157326 0.0443174109184 20% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.3589403974 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 53.8541721854 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.0289183223 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.04 12.2367328918 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.66 8.42419426049 91% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 63.6247240618 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.7273730684 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.