tpo 45 bees ancient nest
The reading passage claims that many skeptics doubt that structures, which have been found inside 200-million-year old fossilized trees, were created by bees. However, the professor casts doubt on each point made by the author. She says that the fossilized structures were indeed created by bees and rejects the claims made in the reading passage.
Although there are no fossils from 200 million years ago, the professor explains that bees are usually preserved in a sticky substance called resin made by trees. However, these trees were rare 200 million years ago. She claims they become widespread later. Therefore, the lack of fossils does not mean that the bees did not exist 200 million years ago.
It is true that bees feed almost exclusively on flowers, but the professor states that bees existed before flowering plants evolved; early bees fed on non-flowering plants. Then, flowering plants evolved so bees became adapted to them and the relationship became established.
Even though there are differences in the structure of the nest, the professor explains that they might have been made by ancient bees. She says modern bees use special water-proofing to protect their nest chambers. The fossilized chambers were chemically analyzed and were found to be similar to modern bees.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The reading passage claims that many ske...
^^^^
Line 1, column 317, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...zed structures were created by bees and all of the skeptical points are not convincing. ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... skeptical points are not convincing. Although there are no fossils which have...
^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ars ago, but they were not preserved. It is true that bees feed almost exclusi...
^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... the relationship became established. Even though there are differences in the...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, so, then, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 10.4613686534 172% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 12.0772626932 116% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 22.412803532 107% => OK
Preposition: 20.0 30.3222958057 66% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 5.01324503311 20% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1172.0 1373.03311258 85% => OK
No of words: 231.0 270.72406181 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.07359307359 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89854898053 4.04702891845 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57335913653 2.5805825403 100% => OK
Unique words: 123.0 145.348785872 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.532467532468 0.540411800872 99% => OK
syllable_count: 344.7 419.366225166 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 5.0 8.23620309051 61% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.6829296992 49.2860985944 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.545454545 110.228320801 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 21.698381199 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.45454545455 7.06452816374 49% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.067633190524 0.272083759551 25% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0307439602329 0.0996497079465 31% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0193142440565 0.0662205650399 29% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0438303224026 0.162205337803 27% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00726262497097 0.0443174109184 16% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.3589403974 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 53.8541721854 109% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 12.2367328918 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.03 8.42419426049 95% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 63.6247240618 77% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.7273730684 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.