tpo 45 bees nests
The reading passage claims that many skeptics doubt that structures, which have been found inside 200-million-year old fossilized trees, were created by bees. However, the professor casts doubt on each point made by the author and she says that it is true that the fossilized structures were created by bees and all of the skeptical points are not convincing.
First of all, the article says that there are no fossils which have been found that date to 200 million years ago. The author mentions the earliest preserved body of a bee is 100 million years old as fossilized structures. On the other hand, the professor states that it is true that there are no fossils of bees that date to 200 years ago; however, fossilized bees were not preserved. She says that bees are usually preserved in a sticky substance called resin made by trees and these trees were rare 200 million years ago. She mentions these trees become common later. So, that does not mean that the bees did not exist 200 million years ago, but they were not preserved.
Second, the reading passage asserts that bees feed almost exclusively on flowers, so the absence of flowering plants 200 million years ago raises another reason to doubt that bees existed in that period. This point is contradicted by the professor. She states that it is true that there is a correlation between flowering plants and bees. However, bees existed before flowering plants evolved and early bees were feeding on non-flowering plants. Then, flowering plants evolved so bees became adapted to them later. As a result, the relationship between flowering plants and bees became stable.
Finally, the article says that the fossilized structure has a similar structure to the chambers made by modern bees. Modern bees have chambers with a spiral caps, but the fossil doesn’t have those caps. On the other hand, the speaker claims that although the chambers lack caps, there is evidence that the chambers were built by bees. She says modern bees use special water-proofing to protect their nest chambers. The fossilized chambers were chemically analyzed. The result of analyzing the fossilized chambers was the water-proofing substances were similar to modern bees.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 314, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...zed structures were created by bees and all of the skeptical points are not convincing. ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... skeptical points are not convincing. First of all, the article says that...
^^^^
Line 5, column 313, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... it is true that there are no fossils of bees that date to 200 years ago; however...
^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ars ago, but they were not preserved. Second, the reading passage asserts...
^^^^
Line 11, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...wering plants and bees became stable. Finally, the article says that the ...
^^^^
Line 13, column 67, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...says that the fossilized structure has a similar structure to the chambers made ...
^^
Line 13, column 93, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tructure has a similar structure to the chambers made by modern bees. Modern bee...
^^
Line 13, column 505, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ly analyzed. The result of analyzing the fossilized chambers was the water-proofi...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, however, second, so, then, as a result, first of all, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 10.4613686534 220% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 5.04856512141 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 22.0 12.0772626932 182% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 22.412803532 156% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 30.3222958057 106% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1861.0 1373.03311258 136% => OK
No of words: 366.0 270.72406181 135% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08469945355 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37391431897 4.04702891845 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56635346079 2.5805825403 99% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 145.348785872 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.426229508197 0.540411800872 79% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 543.6 419.366225166 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 13.0662251656 153% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.8032085905 49.2860985944 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.05 110.228320801 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3 21.698381199 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.2 7.06452816374 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 4.19205298013 191% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.27373068433 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0558391080887 0.272083759551 21% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0241133610704 0.0996497079465 24% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0176135436475 0.0662205650399 27% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0388363280703 0.162205337803 24% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.010296699836 0.0443174109184 23% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.3589403974 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 53.8541721854 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.0289183223 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 12.2367328918 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.46 8.42419426049 89% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 63.6247240618 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.7273730684 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.