TPO 48
The reading passage claims three possible reasons behind the decline numbers of frog species around the world. The lecturer, however, refutes all these reasons.
First, although it was mentioned that pesticides, which are used by farmers, have harmed frog populations. it was asserted that it won’t be fear for the farmers to prohibit it use as their land would suffer with a severe disadvantage such as losing their crop and lands.
Second, even though, they discovered a treatment for a deadly fungus infection. Applying this treatment, however, could be costly, challenging, and it would not stop the spreading of the infection. Since they have to apply the treatment for each frog individually, which requires unwanted extra efforts. This have shown how impractical it could be to use this method.
Finally, despite the fact that some human activities could threaten the natural habitat of these frog species which could affect their numbers. It have been discovered that the main cause behind this destruction is due to global warming, which dry out many of their habitat.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 108, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
... farmers, have harmed frog populations. it was asserted that it won't be fear...
^^
Line 4, column 182, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'uses'?
Suggestion: uses
... be fear for the farmers to prohibit it use as their land would suffer with a sever...
^^^
Line 10, column 148, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'has'?
Suggestion: has
...es which could affect their numbers. It have been discovered that the main cause beh...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, however, second, so, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 7.30242825607 27% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 22.412803532 103% => OK
Preposition: 16.0 30.3222958057 53% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 924.0 1373.03311258 67% => OK
No of words: 174.0 270.72406181 64% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.31034482759 5.08290768461 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63192868298 4.04702891845 90% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60917008444 2.5805825403 101% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 145.348785872 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.64367816092 0.540411800872 119% => OK
syllable_count: 265.5 419.366225166 63% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 2.0 8.23620309051 24% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.269519985 49.2860985944 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.4 110.228320801 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.4 21.698381199 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.4 7.06452816374 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 4.33554083885 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.384396015786 0.272083759551 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.136430403106 0.0996497079465 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0702779633452 0.0662205650399 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.212380642741 0.162205337803 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.039431104845 0.0443174109184 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.3589403974 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 53.8541721854 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.0289183223 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.22 12.2367328918 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.29 8.42419426049 110% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 63.6247240618 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.