TPO 48
The lecture completely refutes the reading passage. The professor mentions three points to indicate that frogs populations will not be saved by applying the solutions which are given in the article.
First, although preventing the use of pesticides by farmers might decrease frogs decline, it would cause economicals problems. This is because the law would be applied only in the areas that surround frogs population and farmers in that area would suffer from insects that would destroy their crops.
Second, even though the fungus treatments have shown great results in reducing frogs infection rate, it is not practical to perform because it requires to hunt each frog alone and treat it individually. The professor mentions that the treatment will treat the parent frogs only but not their offspring, this means the treatment procedure would be applied again and again.
Finally, protecting lakes and marshes could be a good idea if human activities are the main cause of frogs decline, but the main threat of frogs population is global warming. Preventing excessive water use development would not save the frogs populations.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 153, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'hunting'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'require' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: hunting
...ractical to perform because it requires to hunt each frog alone and treat it individual...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, if, second, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 5.04856512141 198% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 12.0772626932 50% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 22.412803532 58% => OK
Preposition: 13.0 30.3222958057 43% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 959.0 1373.03311258 70% => OK
No of words: 180.0 270.72406181 66% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.32777777778 5.08290768461 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66284150148 4.04702891845 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5849218533 2.5805825403 100% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 145.348785872 74% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.6 0.540411800872 111% => OK
syllable_count: 279.9 419.366225166 67% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 3.0 8.23620309051 36% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 13.0662251656 61% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.1675136892 49.2860985944 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.875 110.228320801 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5 21.698381199 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.375 7.06452816374 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.430111285549 0.272083759551 158% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.187816122847 0.0996497079465 188% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0905533091791 0.0662205650399 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.250739372893 0.162205337803 155% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0848349826214 0.0443174109184 191% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.3589403974 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 53.8541721854 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.0289183223 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.93 12.2367328918 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.29 8.42419426049 110% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 63.6247240618 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.