tpo 45 fossilized structures could resemble a bee nests
The material discusses the old fossil sturctures that have been discovered inside 200- million-years-old fossilized trees could resemble bee nests. While the reading claims that these structures were not created by bees becasue of several arguments. The listening disagrees and mentions that it is perfectly possible that these sturctures could be bee nests and adds that all the arguments that states by the reading are not convincing.
First, the author contends that there is no prevesred bees dated back 200 million years ago. On the other hand, the professor opposes this and posits that it is true that the earliest preserved body of a bee is 100 million years old. The lecturer adds that it does not mean that bees did not exist before that. The listening explains that the reason is bees are capable to be preserved in fossilized tree resin. The speaker mentions that these trees were very rare 200 million years ago and may be they became common latter. Furthermore, the lecturer states that bees might exist but there were no trees that could produce that right type of resin to preserve them.
Second, the writer points out that 200 million years ago flowering plants did exist. On the contrary, the lecturer refutes this and mention that bees might exixt and feed on other non-flowering plants, such as furn or pine trees. In addition to that, the professor states that bees could adapt to feed on flowering plants latter.
Third, the reading mentions that the fossilized structures lake spiral caps. Nervetheless, the listening contradicts this and posits that there is a chemical evidence ensure that it is bee nests. The professor explains that modern bees produce specific waterproof material that has certain chemicals. The lecturer adds that by examining fossilized structures found that they have the same chemical material that used by the modern bees.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 149, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...silized trees could resemble bee nests. While the reading claims that these structure...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 413, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... be preserved in fossilized tree resin. The speaker mentions that these trees were ...
^^^
Line 3, column 492, Rule ID: MAY_BE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'maybe' (=perhaps)?
Suggestion: maybe
...ere very rare 200 million years ago and may be they became common latter. Furthermore,...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 74, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t 200 million years ago flowering plants did exist. On the contrary, the lecturer...
^^
Line 5, column 151, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...turer refutes this and mention that bees might exixt and feed on other non-flower...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, if, may, second, so, third, while, in addition, such as, it is true, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 10.4613686534 153% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 5.04856512141 139% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 29.0 12.0772626932 240% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 42.0 22.412803532 187% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 19.0 30.3222958057 63% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1574.0 1373.03311258 115% => OK
No of words: 308.0 270.72406181 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11038961039 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18926351222 4.04702891845 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51387614728 2.5805825403 97% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 145.348785872 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.487012987013 0.540411800872 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 456.3 419.366225166 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 15.0 8.23620309051 182% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.4597182607 49.2860985944 60% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 98.375 110.228320801 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.25 21.698381199 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 7.06452816374 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.27373068433 187% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0589128924844 0.272083759551 22% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0235912586968 0.0996497079465 24% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0125535834299 0.0662205650399 19% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0395582472875 0.162205337803 24% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00760779117728 0.0443174109184 17% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.3589403974 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 53.8541721854 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 12.2367328918 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.71 8.42419426049 92% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 63.6247240618 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.