TPO-45 - Integrated Writing Task
In the set of materials, the reading passage talks about some theory that show the fossil structures that discovery can’t be bee nests and the listening passage talk about same issue but provide some extra information to prove the fossil structures that discovered can be bee nests.
According to the reading passage this structure can't be bee nests because of three reasons. first, no fossil remains of actual bees have ever been found that date 200 million years ago. The earliest body of bee is 100 million years ago. second, today’s bees feed almost on the flowers of flower plants and flower plants first appeared on earth 125 million years ago, so the bee can't be before the flower plants. The last reason is, chambers of modern bee nest are closed by caps that a spiral pattern, but the fossilized chambers lake such caps.
The professor in the listening passage says that the argument of the reading passage is not convincing and bee nest can be at that time, because of three reasons. first, there aren’t any convincing idea that show bee didn’t exist before that time, therefore the first idea of the reading passage proved unconvincing. second, flower plants don’t exist at that time but maybe the bees feed from un flowering plants because at that time un flowering plants existed, so the writer’s second idea rebutted. Third, the modern chamber containing one social water proof material that the old chamber had this material too, thus reliably the last reason of reading passage retorted.
To sum it all up by taking all the details in the consideration the listening passage retorted the reading passages context and noticed that the bee nest can be exist in 200 million years agoo and this discovery can be bee nests.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 49, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...g to the reading passage this structure cant be bee nests because of three reasons. ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 93, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: First
... be bee nests because of three reasons. first, no fossil remains of actual bees have ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 238, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Second
...t body of bee is 100 million years ago. second, today's bees feed almost on the f...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 384, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...earth 125 million years ago, so the bee cant be before the flower plants. The last r...
^^^^
Line 5, column 164, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: First
...at that time, because of three reasons. first, there aren't any convincing idea ...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 328, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Second
...he reading passage proved unconvincing. second, flower plants don't exist at that...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 570, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled as one.
Suggestion: waterproof
...he modern chamber containing one social water proof material that the old chamber had this ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, may, second, so, therefore, third, thus
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 22.412803532 76% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 30.3222958057 99% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1477.0 1373.03311258 108% => OK
No of words: 297.0 270.72406181 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.97306397306 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 4.04702891845 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44993863639 2.5805825403 95% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 145.348785872 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.484848484848 0.540411800872 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 438.3 419.366225166 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 8.23620309051 61% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 21.2450331126 127% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 63.6364935064 49.2860985944 129% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.272727273 110.228320801 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.0 21.698381199 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.63636363636 7.06452816374 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 4.19205298013 167% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 4.33554083885 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.27373068433 187% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0800378225677 0.272083759551 29% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0358978519567 0.0996497079465 36% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0240197189216 0.0662205650399 36% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0602607006167 0.162205337803 37% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0104063158727 0.0443174109184 23% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.3589403974 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 53.8541721854 98% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 11.0289183223 114% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 12.2367328918 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.95 8.42419426049 94% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 63.6247240618 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.498013245 122% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.