TPO-45 - Integrated Writing Task Any student of paleontology will be struck by the fact that a great many animals of the past were considerably larger than they are today. This holds true for species ranging from dinosaurs to most mammals. Just why they w

In this set of materials, the passage states that more considerable large animals such as mammals and dinosaurs are because of three reasons. However, the lecturer finds all the idea dubious and skeptical and emphasizes that none of them are based on authentic facts so provides some evidence to refute them all.

First of all the author of the reading claims that early earth had greater supply of Oxygen. In the contrast, the professor argues that volcanic activities produced a lot of poisonous gases that polluted the air so it was hard to breath and the amount of oxygen was even less than now. Therefore, the oxygen level cannot be the reason of huge animals.

Furthermore, it is mentioned in the reading passage that abundant nutrients in plants played an important role for animals to grow. On the contrary, the lecturer contends that although the earth had vast amount of plants, they were low in nutrients. According to fossils, scientists understood that their useful ingredients were scarce since the plants did not have enough CO2 in contaminated air. Hence, the second reason is not a logical fact.

Finally, the article asserts that warm climate stimulated animals to get bigger dimensions. Conversely, the professor states that it is not a sensible explanation. Larger animals consumes more food and then produced more heat and they need to cool up their body. In warm climate it is harder to counteract body heat and reach to standard temperature. In other words, animals are smaller in warm areas. Thus, Not only does not it have positive effect, but also it has negative impact.

Votes
Average: 8.1 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 430, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'has'?
Suggestion: has
... warm areas. Thus, Not only does not it have positive effect, but also it has negati...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, conversely, finally, first, furthermore, hence, however, second, so, then, therefore, thus, such as, first of all, in other words, on the contrary

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 22.412803532 103% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 30.3222958057 102% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1341.0 1373.03311258 98% => OK
No of words: 268.0 270.72406181 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.00373134328 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04607285448 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57743465759 2.5805825403 100% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 145.348785872 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.611940298507 0.540411800872 113% => OK
syllable_count: 416.7 419.366225166 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 2.5761589404 233% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.738338358 49.2860985944 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.4 110.228320801 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8666666667 21.698381199 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.4666666667 7.06452816374 148% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 4.33554083885 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.32981120833 0.272083759551 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0867031652397 0.0996497079465 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0541990660317 0.0662205650399 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.1601222297 0.162205337803 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0280336449725 0.0443174109184 63% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.3589403974 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 53.8541721854 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.42 12.2367328918 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.66 8.42419426049 103% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 63.6247240618 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.7273730684 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 81.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.