To begin with, the passage basically explains about possibilities of early animals to be larger than now providing three reasons. Meanwhile, the lecture disagrees with the passage, and claims that the reasonings given are impossible to verify and are somewhat contradictory.
Firstly, the passage avers that in the early earth, there used to be greater amount of oxygen supply which directly stimulated the growth of larger animals. In contrast, the lecture contends the fact that there used to be number of volcanic eruptions. This might have released a lot of harmful gases resulting in less amount of oxygen due to which it might be harder for animals to breathe. Thus, the first reason given by passage was proven to be absurd by the lecture.
Secondly, it is affirmed that there were abundant plants which provided plenty nutrition for animals to grow rapidly. While, the lecture casts doubt on it saying though there were vast amount of plants, they lagged nutrition. It also included the fact that early fossil study has confirmed it. Therefore, the second reason was ruled out by the lecture.
Thirdly, the passage has explained the earth's warm climate as the support for the growth of larger animals. Because of the warm climate, animals did not need to spend energies for warming themselves instead they used their extra energies to generate cells. This might have passed on to the generations. Whereas, the lecture talks about the disadvantages of warm climate which could not be supportive of animal growth. As the animals took off too much of heat inside, they needed to cool off their bodies to maintain temperature within. So, it would have been difficult for them to survive in such climate. Hence, the third reason of the passage is ruled out by the lecture.
- TPO-19 - Integrated Writing Task Many consumers ignore commercial advertisements. In response, advertising companies have started using a new tactic, called “buzzing." The advertisers hire people,buzzers,who personally promote (buzz) products to people 85
- #7 How do movies or television influence people's behavior? use reasons and specific examples to support your answer. 73
- 32. The following appeared in a memo from a vice president of Quiot Manufacturing.During the past year, Quiot Manufacturing had 30 percent more on-the-job accidents than at the nearby Panoply Industries plant, where the work shifts are one hour shorter th 50
- TPO-02 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Always telling the truth is the most important consideration in any relationship between people.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
- TPO-12 - Integrated Writing Task Jane Austen (1775-1817) is one of the most famous of all English novelists, and today her novels are more popular than ever, with several recently adapted as Hollywood movies. But we do not have many records of what she lo 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 304, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ight have passed on to the generations. Whereas, the lecture talks about the disadvanta...
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, hence, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, third, thirdly, thus, whereas, while, in contrast, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.4613686534 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 7.30242825607 27% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 22.412803532 89% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 30.3222958057 158% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1488.0 1373.03311258 108% => OK
No of words: 297.0 270.72406181 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0101010101 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 4.04702891845 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47324217257 2.5805825403 96% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 145.348785872 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.548821548822 0.540411800872 102% => OK
syllable_count: 459.9 419.366225166 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 3.25607064018 215% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 13.0662251656 130% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.2136837603 49.2860985944 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.5294117647 110.228320801 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.4705882353 21.698381199 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.64705882353 7.06452816374 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.27373068433 187% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.330779009313 0.272083759551 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0969626918262 0.0996497079465 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0703841156951 0.0662205650399 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.1886650646 0.162205337803 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0563829585237 0.0443174109184 127% => OK
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.3589403974 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 53.8541721854 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.0289183223 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.48 12.2367328918 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.36 8.42419426049 99% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 63.6247240618 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
Rates: 78.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.5 Out of 30
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.