TPO 46
Question: Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific points made in the reading passage.
medical about patient traditionally or electronic
The reading and the listening passages have a debate on benefits of electronic medical information of sick peoples in compare to paper-based ones. The penman puts forward 3 main reasons, which are refuted by following orator.
First of all, the writer proposes that electronic version diminishes the cost of producing, transferring and maintaining data. On the contrary, the speaker views this issue from an opposite angle. According to her, keeping formal data needs to signature and if the doctors use the electronic information they should have a paper copy of them too.
In addition, second point offered by the author is that using not-paper method help to minimize the error of unclear handwriting and other recording mistakes. On the other hand, the professor casts doubt on this assumption by saying that most doctors still use pen and pencil during visiting the patients and if they should use the computer, it is needed to other person to enter data to it. As a result, possibility of doing mistake exist yet.
Lastly, the reading suggests that helping to researchers is more convenient by electronic data. However, the speaker holds a different position. She explains that strict province laws don not allow to speculators for having access to all kind of desired data. Not only should they follow sever processes to acquire permission, but they also may prevented by people who produce information through blocking availability of that data because of unknown purposes.
In all, the ideas mentioned in the lecture counter the opinions in the text in that unavoidable proofing and writing medical information in paper, in addition to undeniable bureaucracy for obtaining electronic sources make it difficult going in to modern electronic world.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 173, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...er-based ones. The penman puts forward 3 main reasons, which are refuted by follo...
^^
Line 13, column 276, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ll kind of desired data. Not only should they follow sever processes to acquire p...
^^
Line 17, column 274, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...lt going in to modern electronic world.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, lastly, may, second, so, still, in addition, kind of, as a result, first of all, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 10.4613686534 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 22.412803532 85% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 30.3222958057 145% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.01324503311 160% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1494.0 1373.03311258 109% => OK
No of words: 282.0 270.72406181 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.29787234043 5.08290768461 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7735030737 2.5805825403 107% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 145.348785872 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.627659574468 0.540411800872 116% => OK
syllable_count: 461.7 419.366225166 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 2.5761589404 233% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 66.4697288401 49.2860985944 135% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.923076923 110.228320801 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6923076923 21.698381199 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.2307692308 7.06452816374 159% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.309325876311 0.272083759551 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0860489027304 0.0996497079465 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0628039052995 0.0662205650399 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147177713817 0.162205337803 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0289734652478 0.0443174109184 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.3589403974 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 53.8541721854 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.0289183223 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.46 12.2367328918 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.44 8.42419426049 112% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 63.6247240618 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.7273730684 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.