TPO-47
In the lecture professor opposes against the arguments in the text about pterosaurs powered flight. She states that this animal may have been capable of powered flight.
First, the text claimed that the metabolism needed for powered flight was not available for them due to being cold-blooded. In other words, cold-blooded animals are unable to produce enough energy for powered flight. However, the speaker refutes the idea of Pterosaurs being cold-blooded. She illustrates that having dense hairlike covering and fair covering is the charactristic of warm-blooded animals. Therefore, they were warm-blooded and had faster metabolism which enable them to supply their powered flight.
Also, the reading argued with the possibility of powered flight due to heavy weight of animal. The professor challanged that idea by clarifying that although the animal was big, the weight was not heavy. They had hollow bones which made them light for size. This made them low enough weight to be able produce airborn energy by moving wings fast and be able to fly.
Lastly, the lecturer disagrees with the reading's idea about not having back legs for jump or running fast make the possibility of flight for this animal less likely. She states that the need of having strong back legs for powered flight is for 2 limbs animals birds who need to use them fo running fast or jumping high to be able to take off the ground. In 4 limbs animals there is no need for having strong back leg because they can use their 4 limbs to push off and run fast or jump high to take off the ground and launch themselves to the air.
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 72, Rule ID: HEAVY_WEIGHT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'heavyweight'?
Suggestion: heavyweight
...he possibility of powered flight due to heavy weight of animal. The professor challanged tha...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 41, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'readings'' or 'reading's'?
Suggestion: readings'; reading's
...Lastly, the lecturer disagrees with the readings idea about not having back legs for jum...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, lastly, may, so, therefore, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.4613686534 134% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 22.412803532 103% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 30.3222958057 109% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 5.01324503311 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1329.0 1373.03311258 97% => OK
No of words: 274.0 270.72406181 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.8503649635 5.08290768461 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0685311056 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.43374839025 2.5805825403 94% => OK
Unique words: 133.0 145.348785872 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.485401459854 0.540411800872 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 396.0 419.366225166 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.52241758 49.2860985944 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.9285714286 110.228320801 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5714285714 21.698381199 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.85714285714 7.06452816374 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.151129001844 0.272083759551 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0674198723365 0.0996497079465 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.056553629801 0.0662205650399 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121797626593 0.162205337803 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0935350275352 0.0443174109184 211% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.3589403974 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 53.8541721854 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 11.0289183223 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.85 12.2367328918 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.35 8.42419426049 87% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 63.6247240618 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.7273730684 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 68.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 72, Rule ID: HEAVY_WEIGHT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'heavyweight'?
Suggestion: heavyweight
...he possibility of powered flight due to heavy weight of animal. The professor challanged tha...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 41, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'readings'' or 'reading's'?
Suggestion: readings'; reading's
...Lastly, the lecturer disagrees with the readings idea about not having back legs for jum...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, lastly, may, so, therefore, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.4613686534 134% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 22.412803532 103% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 30.3222958057 109% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 5.01324503311 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1329.0 1373.03311258 97% => OK
No of words: 274.0 270.72406181 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.8503649635 5.08290768461 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0685311056 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.43374839025 2.5805825403 94% => OK
Unique words: 133.0 145.348785872 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.485401459854 0.540411800872 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 396.0 419.366225166 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.52241758 49.2860985944 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.9285714286 110.228320801 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5714285714 21.698381199 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.85714285714 7.06452816374 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.151129001844 0.272083759551 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0674198723365 0.0996497079465 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.056553629801 0.0662205650399 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121797626593 0.162205337803 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0935350275352 0.0443174109184 211% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.3589403974 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 53.8541721854 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 11.0289183223 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.85 12.2367328918 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.35 8.42419426049 87% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 63.6247240618 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.7273730684 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 68.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.