The reading states that Pterosaurs, which were an ancient group of winged reptiles, were not capable of fliging and provides three reaaons. The professor, however, explains that Pterosaurs may have power flight and refutes each of the author's reasons.
First, the reading claims that Pterosaurs were cold-blooded, which are not able to fly. The professor refutes this point by stating that Pterosaurs had hair, which enable them to fly. She says that birds which are covered with hair are warm-blooded animals. Besides, she mentions that warm-blooded birds are able to fly. She concludes that because Pterosaurs were warm-blooded and were capable of producing a lot of energy, they could fly.
Second, the reading indicates that Pterosaurs could not fly because of their heavy weight. The professor explains that though Pterosaurs had larg size, they were very light. She says that their bones were hollow which were very light. As a result, she mentions that they were very light and were able to fly.
Third, the reading states that birds which fly can take off on the ground but Pterosaurs could not do because they were very larg. The professor opposes this point by compairing Pterosaurs with birds. She says that birds have two legs and they use them to take off. On the other hand, the professor says that Pterosaurs walk on four legs, thus, they have truble to walk very fast and they have enough energy to jump.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 78, Rule ID: HEAVY_WEIGHT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'heavyweight'?
Suggestion: heavyweight
...erosaurs could not fly because of their heavy weight. The professor explains that though Pte...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 407, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...lk very fast and they have enough energy to jump.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, first, however, may, second, so, third, thus, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.4613686534 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 20.0 12.0772626932 166% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 22.412803532 147% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 22.0 30.3222958057 73% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 5.01324503311 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1185.0 1373.03311258 86% => OK
No of words: 239.0 270.72406181 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.95815899582 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.93187294222 4.04702891845 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.33486300055 2.5805825403 90% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 145.348785872 75% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.456066945607 0.540411800872 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 338.4 419.366225166 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 3.25607064018 276% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 21.2450331126 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.6883638819 49.2860985944 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 79.0 110.228320801 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.9333333333 21.698381199 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 7.06452816374 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 4.45695364238 22% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 12.0 4.27373068433 281% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.41325462935 0.272083759551 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.15760646671 0.0996497079465 158% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0598765579826 0.0662205650399 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.267716232221 0.162205337803 165% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0153380384717 0.0443174109184 35% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.9 13.3589403974 74% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.17 53.8541721854 136% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 11.0289183223 62% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.19 12.2367328918 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.69 8.42419426049 79% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 63.6247240618 55% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 10.7273730684 56% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.498013245 76% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.2008830022 62% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.