The lecture and the reading are discussing the possibility of flying the Pterosaurs which was a special kind of dinosaurs. The passage explains about the impossibility of the flying this kind of dinosaur and proposes some reasons for this assertion. However, the professor in the lecture challenges this hypothesis and gives some illustrations that oppose the passage.
First, the professor in the lecture believes that the Pterosaurs had the warm-blood metabolism, therefore, they could have had enough energy to fly. He illustrates that this kind of dinosaurs had a dense hair-like covering which should have been for keeping them warm. Hence, they were warm-blooded. The professor's acclaim is in contrast to the passage that states dinosaurs were similar to reptiles; thereupon, they should have been cold-blooded, so, they did not have enough energy for flying.
Second, the professor in the lecture acclaims that Pterosaurs had hollow anatomy; hence, they were enough light to be able for flying. The professor explains that although these dinosaurs were huge, but their body was hollow; therefore, they should have had low weight and could fly. This allegation challenges the argumentation of the reading that states, the Pterosaurs were very heavy because of their big size; hence, they were not being able to fly.
Third, the lecture asserts that Pterosaurs take up by their four legs. The professor states that these dinosaurs had different taking up from birds; the birds use their legs and jump to fly. However, because these dinosaurs had weak leg muscles, hence, they should have used their all four legs, not just back ones. This explanation is contrary to the passage that states these dinosaurs should have taken up similar to birds, but their back leg muscles were weak, therefore, they could not fly.
All in all, the professor in the lecture challenges the points in the passage about the ability of Pterosaurs to fly. He believes that these dinosaurs were able to fly because they were warm-blooded, hollow, and use their four legs for taking up.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, hence, however, if, second, so, therefore, third, in contrast, kind of, in contrast to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 10.4613686534 172% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 5.04856512141 158% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 42.0 22.412803532 187% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 30.3222958057 112% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1743.0 1373.03311258 127% => OK
No of words: 336.0 270.72406181 124% => OK
Chars per words: 5.1875 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28139028586 4.04702891845 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59602809896 2.5805825403 101% => OK
Unique words: 139.0 145.348785872 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.41369047619 0.540411800872 77% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 518.4 419.366225166 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 3.25607064018 399% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 12.0 8.23620309051 146% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.51434878587 198% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.9941915791 49.2860985944 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.9375 110.228320801 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 21.698381199 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.125 7.06452816374 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.317843010987 0.272083759551 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.134790072506 0.0996497079465 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0649156084505 0.0662205650399 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.209804841714 0.162205337803 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0773444113198 0.0443174109184 175% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.3589403974 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 53.8541721854 109% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 12.2367328918 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.36 8.42419426049 87% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 63.6247240618 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.