Tpo -48-1
The reading explains three methods to address the problem of increasing frog population. While the professor believes that these methods are not practical and refuses them as follow.
Firstly, the reading claims that pesticides are the most contributor in the problem of declining frog population. Controversy, the professor reckons that farmers usually have used pesticides to increase the amount of crops each year. Actually, introducing laws to prohibited the farmers from using pesticides can have negative effect on the crops production and the agricultural industry can be damaged by new laws.
Secondly, the reading affirms that by treating or preventing infection, including antifungal medication can cope with the problem of fungus. In contrast, the professor points out that this method of treatment is not practical. Since each individual frog must be capture and treated by antifungal. Furthermore, this treatment must be repeated for each generation. Therefore, this method is not only complex, but also expensive.
Eventually, although, the reading introduces the natural habitat of frogs have been threated and this problem has posed a dire effect on the population of frogs, the professor claims that global warming is culprit of this extinction. Since, due to the global warming the level of water lake increase and as a result, frogs have lost their habitat.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 173, Rule ID: AS_FOLLOW[1]
Message: Did you mean 'as follows'?
Suggestion: as follows
...hods are not practical and refuses them as follow. Firstly, the reading claims that pest...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 341, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'crops'' or 'crop's'?
Suggestion: crops'; crop's
...ticides can have negative effect on the crops production and the agricultural industr...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, in contrast, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 12.0772626932 50% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 22.412803532 62% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 30.3222958057 79% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.01324503311 199% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1169.0 1373.03311258 85% => OK
No of words: 213.0 270.72406181 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.4882629108 5.08290768461 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82027741392 4.04702891845 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83897455067 2.5805825403 110% => OK
Unique words: 124.0 145.348785872 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.582159624413 0.540411800872 108% => OK
syllable_count: 352.8 419.366225166 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 48.5926949242 49.2860985944 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.4166666667 110.228320801 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.75 21.698381199 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.83333333333 7.06452816374 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.302481564348 0.272083759551 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10406387549 0.0996497079465 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0707542676354 0.0662205650399 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.172193190928 0.162205337803 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0564567322945 0.0443174109184 127% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.3589403974 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 53.8541721854 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.27 12.2367328918 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.45 8.42419426049 112% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 63.6247240618 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.7273730684 84% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.