tpo 48
In this set of materials, the reading section discusses the alarming reductions of frog populations due to environmental changes and proposed several possible solutions to prevent this problem, whereas the listening part casts doubt on the information presented in the article by refusing the mentioned reasons.
First, the reading posits that since pesticides have a detrimental effect on the frog’s total population, a strict law must be passed forbidden to use of pesticides. In contrast, the professor underlines the fact that ceasing the use of pesticides by farmers is not a logical solution since the farmers mostly rely on the pesticide to increase their yields and amount of crops. In fact, the farmers who are in the close of the threatened places, if they are limited to use pesticides, their yield crop will reduce and they easily lose the market and would not be able to compete with the other farmers who are allowed to use pesticides. In the light of these explanations, it is not fair to abandon the use of pesticides and it is not the economically convincing solution.
Furthermore, the article holds the view that since the infection by a fungus is widespread among frogs, so it is logic to kill them to prevent their fatally effect on the frog’s species. However, the lecture postulates that for treating they have to apply individually on each fog. Since it requires to capture each frog to apply the drug on them, so if we want to apply on large scale of population, it would be not as practical as seems. Moreover, the professor explains that this method does not guarantee the next generation of frogs from the fungus’s infection danger, so it needs to apply on the next generation. So, this method is a too complicated and costly process.
Finally, according to the text, the most important inhabitant for frogs are swamps and wetland, by protecting these places of developing side effects they would be in safe. Conversely, the professor disagrees with this points and states that excessive use of water by a human is not the biggest problem for frogs, whereas global warming is the most important threaten for decreasing the water of wetlands which appears in the recent decades. Actually, the global warming has threatened most of the inhabitants of animals living in the water, therefore, by limiting the use of water for human developing tasks, it would not be helpful to save the frog population from decreasing.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
In this set of materials, the reading se...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...cle by refusing the mentioned reasons. First, the reading posits that since pes...
^^^
Line 2, column 645, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...mers who are allowed to use pesticides. In the light of these explanations, it is ...
^^
Line 3, column 305, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'capturing'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'require' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: capturing
...vidually on each fog. Since it requires to capture each frog to apply the drug on them, so...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 215, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...onversely, the professor disagrees with this points and states that excessive use of...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, conversely, finally, first, furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, whereas, in contrast, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 10.4613686534 163% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 30.0 22.412803532 134% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 65.0 30.3222958057 214% => Less preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 11.0 5.01324503311 219% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2088.0 1373.03311258 152% => OK
No of words: 411.0 270.72406181 152% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0802919708 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.50256981431 4.04702891845 111% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83388670542 2.5805825403 110% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 145.348785872 140% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.496350364964 0.540411800872 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 639.9 419.366225166 153% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 2.5761589404 311% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 31.0 21.2450331126 146% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 67.8832098351 49.2860985944 138% => OK
Chars per sentence: 160.615384615 110.228320801 146% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.6153846154 21.698381199 146% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.07692307692 7.06452816374 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 4.45695364238 179% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.404699512029 0.272083759551 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.133058923328 0.0996497079465 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0644197686359 0.0662205650399 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.214133946319 0.162205337803 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0663752811341 0.0443174109184 150% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.3 13.3589403974 137% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.01 53.8541721854 74% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 5.55761589404 202% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.0289183223 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.78 12.2367328918 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.48 8.42419426049 113% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 63.6247240618 176% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 20.0 10.7273730684 186% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.498013245 137% => OK
text_standard: 20.0 11.2008830022 179% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.