The reading describes three assumptions that cause the decline of some frog species from their natural habitat. However, the lecture asserts that assumption does not seem to be practical. The lecturer supports her idea by illustrating her own beliefs.
First, making laws to restrict the use of pesticide in farmland will not financially benefit the farmer. Farmers use pesticide in order to grow more crops, but, without using pesticides, farmers get less crops from that region where farmers use pesticides. As a result, they will suffer in the market.
Second, although antifungal is helpful to save the frog from dehydration, this process is very difficult to ensure. The lecture also says that, it is essential to treat every individual frog with antifungal to cure them. Additionally, this antifungal does not transfer to their offspring’s body. So that it also required to push this antifungal to their baby. This whole process will be too expensive.
Third, water from the lakes and marshes are used by the people. It does not reduce the amount of water from lakes and marshes. If we stop the use of water from lakes and marshes it will not save the habitat of frog. Furthermore, the speaker also states that the increase of global warming is the main cause of the reduction of water in the lakes and marshes.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 200, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun crops is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
..., without using pesticides, farmers get less crops from that region where farmers us...
^^^^
Line 5, column 302, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[3]
Message: “So that” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ransfer to their offspring's body. So that it also required to push this antifunga...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, however, if, second, so, third, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 12.0772626932 58% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 22.412803532 98% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 30.3222958057 106% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1112.0 1373.03311258 81% => OK
No of words: 222.0 270.72406181 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.00900900901 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8600083453 4.04702891845 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65030284803 2.5805825403 103% => OK
Unique words: 125.0 145.348785872 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.563063063063 0.540411800872 104% => OK
syllable_count: 340.2 419.366225166 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 5.0 8.23620309051 61% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.25165562914 320% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 21.2450331126 66% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.2345570261 49.2860985944 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 74.1333333333 110.228320801 67% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.8 21.698381199 68% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.93333333333 7.06452816374 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.27373068433 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.324459129946 0.272083759551 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103912777887 0.0996497079465 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0913673390277 0.0662205650399 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.173314317435 0.162205337803 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0439426329445 0.0443174109184 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.6 13.3589403974 72% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.73 53.8541721854 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 11.0289183223 69% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.19 12.2367328918 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.39 8.42419426049 100% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 63.6247240618 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.7273730684 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.498013245 72% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 71.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.