TPO 48 - Integrated Writing Task
In the passage, it is presented that there are several ways to solve the problem of declining frog populations. In contrast, in the lecture, the professor states the weaknesses of all three methods.
First of all, it is proposed in the passage that frogs are being harmed by pesticides. So people can make laws to confine peasants from using the pesticides in order to protect frogs. Notwithstanding, in the lecture, the professor opposes that if farmers living near the cut habitats of frogs cut down the use of pesticides, more crops will be threatened as farmers rely on pesticides most to prevent pests from devouring crops. Then these farmers may not be the strong competitors in the market.
Secondly, it is thought to be feasible that people can use antifungal medication and treatments to limit the spread of fungus. Nevertheless, the professor holds a different point of view that the method used to solve the problem has to be available to be applied to use to each individual. Consequently, implementing the method in a large scale will be extremely difficult. Indeed, the application of this method is too complicated and expensive.
Thirdly, in the reading, it seems to be plausible that people can protect frog populations by reduce the use and development of water and wetlands. However, the professor objects to it that it may not work because water and wetlands are mainly threatened by the phenomenon of global warming.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... the strong competitors in the market. Secondly, it is thought to be feasible t...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, however, if, may, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, then, third, thirdly, as to, in contrast, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.4613686534 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 5.04856512141 139% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 12.0772626932 58% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 22.412803532 67% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 30.3222958057 132% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1209.0 1373.03311258 88% => OK
No of words: 240.0 270.72406181 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0375 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.93597934253 4.04702891845 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95444286438 2.5805825403 114% => OK
Unique words: 132.0 145.348785872 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.55 0.540411800872 102% => OK
syllable_count: 370.8 419.366225166 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 5.0 8.23620309051 61% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.1844690285 49.2860985944 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.75 110.228320801 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 21.698381199 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.75 7.06452816374 152% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 4.45695364238 179% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.319221939664 0.272083759551 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108898812019 0.0996497079465 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0881599567438 0.0662205650399 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.183469512057 0.162205337803 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0603125104233 0.0443174109184 136% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.3589403974 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 53.8541721854 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 12.2367328918 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.9 8.42419426049 106% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 63.6247240618 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.