TPO-48 - Integrated Writing Task
Text and the lecture both are discussing about the cause and solution of descreasing the population of frogs. Obviously, two have opposed viewpoint as follow.
First, based on the reading, by removing pestoside around the lands it would be beneficial for saving the frog population. In this regard, professor has a different opinion and states that it is not a practical idea; since it is not economical and fair. In fact, farmers are extremely depending on these chemicals to produce better crops and compete with others.
Second, Unlike the text, lecturer points it out that killing fungus growing around demands for applying in groups of them not individuals; which is incredibaly expensive and complicated. What's more, this treatment has no effect on the next generation of fungus and should be repeated.
Finally, as lecturer mentions, protecting lakes and marshes from human over-use is not the main thread they are faced.Indeed, it is the issue of global warming that have significant contribution in disappearance of many species rather than prohibiting humans from using water or building nearby frog habitants.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 149, Rule ID: AS_FOLLOW[1]
Message: Did you mean 'as follows'?
Suggestion: as follows
.... Obviously, two have opposed viewpoint as follow. First, based on the reading, by remov...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 271, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...t economical and fair. In fact, farmers are extremely depending on these chemicals to produce better cr...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 187, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: What's
... incredibaly expensive and complicated. Whats more, this treatment has no effect on t...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 118, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Indeed
...e is not the main thread they are faced.Indeed, it is the issue of global warming that...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, if, second, so, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 12.0772626932 33% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 22.412803532 58% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 30.3222958057 79% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 946.0 1373.03311258 69% => OK
No of words: 178.0 270.72406181 66% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.31460674157 5.08290768461 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65262427087 4.04702891845 90% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85605512507 2.5805825403 111% => OK
Unique words: 125.0 145.348785872 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.702247191011 0.540411800872 130% => OK
syllable_count: 290.7 419.366225166 69% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 0.0 8.23620309051 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 13.0662251656 61% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 73.9302881098 49.2860985944 150% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.25 110.228320801 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.25 21.698381199 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5 7.06452816374 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.287737152789 0.272083759551 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.085411664421 0.0996497079465 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0817872028904 0.0662205650399 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135489562185 0.162205337803 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.083745329459 0.0443174109184 189% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.3589403974 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 53.8541721854 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.0289183223 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 12.2367328918 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.41 8.42419426049 124% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 63.6247240618 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.