Although the author argues three methods to solve the problems of either declining or extinction of frog species in recent years, the professor finds them dubious and brings up three counter reasons to refute them all.
First, the author believes that farmers should be prevented from utilizing pesticides and chemical materials for farmlands since they endanger the frog populations. However, the professor gainsays this idea and states that prohibiting farmers from spreading pesticides is not economically advantageous. Government should not enact such restrict laws by which farmers are not able to remain in competitive markets and this leads them decline in growing crops and decreasing the yield.
Second, the author holds the view that some antifungal treatments and medication should be applied in order to prevent infection on frogs since fungus cause them to be dehydrated. The professor, on the other hand, asserts that there would be two problems with this treatment. Firstly, scientists should trace and capture each frogs and then apply this treatment for them which is not doable. In addition, they should figure out how to prevent this effect for offspring and next generations. Both of aforementioned problems are so sophisticated and costly.
Third, the author explains that by preserving frogs' habitat such as wetlands and lakes and stop draining water from these water sources by humans, they are more likely to be protected. In contrast, the professor claims that losing excessive amount of water is not due to the human activities. It is a global problem and affect the entire species which should be considered in large scale.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, second, so, then, third, in addition, in contrast, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 5.04856512141 139% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 7.30242825607 192% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 22.412803532 94% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 30.3222958057 106% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1400.0 1373.03311258 102% => OK
No of words: 262.0 270.72406181 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.34351145038 5.08290768461 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02323427807 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69290430241 2.5805825403 104% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 145.348785872 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.599236641221 0.540411800872 111% => OK
syllable_count: 403.2 419.366225166 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.5234982057 49.2860985944 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.666666667 110.228320801 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8333333333 21.698381199 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.83333333333 7.06452816374 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.336131192635 0.272083759551 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.11485156853 0.0996497079465 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0760626478458 0.0662205650399 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.200353772368 0.162205337803 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.042275515059 0.0443174109184 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.3589403974 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 53.8541721854 109% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.69 12.2367328918 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.62 8.42419426049 114% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 63.6247240618 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 10.7273730684 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 86.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.