Although the author argues three main hypotheses to support the fact that Robert E.Peary, a well-known astronomer, reached the North Pole in 1909, the professor finds them dubious and brings up three reasons to refute them all.
Firstly, the author holds the view that by using investigation of Peary's record conducted by the National Geographic Society committee, they found this claim plausible. However, the professor gainsays this idea and states while it is true that the National Geographic Society declare this true, but it is not completely accepted due to the fact that one of the close friends' of Peary had funded for this expedition and they show that it was 2 days expedition and the records are not carefully obtained.
Secondly, the author argues that although at first it was unbelivable, by camparing the speed of Tom Avery with the speed of Peary's claim, it was true enough to make sure this claim is true. In contrast, the professor asserts that Tom Averywas feeded by aor plan and it was different with Peary's. Moreover, the Tom Avery was so in favor with weather condition while the Peary's was sensitive.
Eeventualy, the reading material states that the photofraphs taken by Peary and measuring the shadow which leads tho calculate the Sun's posotion is a good evidence. On the other hand, the speaker believes that photographs are not adequate to measuring the shadow precisely. They might have been taken by primitive cameras and worn and blured by time.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Although” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
Although the author argues three main hypotheses...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 84, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Peary
...heses to support the fact that Robert E.Peary, a well-known astronomer, reached the N...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, well, while, in contrast, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 22.412803532 112% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 30.3222958057 86% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1241.0 1373.03311258 90% => OK
No of words: 247.0 270.72406181 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.02429149798 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96437052324 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56237245417 2.5805825403 99% => OK
Unique words: 140.0 145.348785872 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.566801619433 0.540411800872 105% => OK
syllable_count: 371.7 419.366225166 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 13.0662251656 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 21.2450331126 127% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 76.3541132964 49.2860985944 155% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.888888889 110.228320801 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.4444444444 21.698381199 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.4444444444 7.06452816374 190% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.307286427935 0.272083759551 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105545206267 0.0996497079465 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0490071409617 0.0662205650399 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.153261007889 0.162205337803 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0202357729933 0.0443174109184 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.3589403974 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 53.8541721854 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 11.0289183223 114% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 12.2367328918 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.0 8.42419426049 107% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 63.6247240618 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 10.7273730684 168% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.498013245 122% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.