The reading exposes some ideas to control or prevent the decrease in numbers of many frog species. However, the professor cast doubt that information.
First, the lecturer explains that reducing the use of pesticides do not work. In fact it's economic unfair. For instance, small farmers that live nearby frog habitats will be sevearely prejudeced. To contradict, the reading states that with laws to forbid the farmers to use pesticides in their crops it would predude the death of frogs.
Second, the professor says that the use of medication to treat fungus diseases in frogs would not be practical. Each frog or especies are affected differentily by the fungus and need a individual treatment. In addition the desease will continue to be passed though generations and the treatment would never comes to an end.
Third, according to the professor the real problem in frog's habitat is related to global warming and not to the decline of their natural habitats by human activities, as described in the reading.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 184, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...ted differentily by the fungus and need a individual treatment. In addition the d...
^
Line 5, column 211, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: addition,
...gus and need a individual treatment. In addition the desease will continue to be passed ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, second, so, third, as to, for instance, in addition, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 10.4613686534 48% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 12.0772626932 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 9.0 22.412803532 40% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 30.3222958057 82% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 853.0 1373.03311258 62% => OK
No of words: 167.0 270.72406181 62% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.10778443114 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.59483629437 4.04702891845 89% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67812655845 2.5805825403 104% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 145.348785872 72% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.622754491018 0.540411800872 115% => OK
syllable_count: 258.3 419.366225166 62% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 8.23620309051 61% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 16.0 21.2450331126 75% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.9313100192 49.2860985944 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.3 110.228320801 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.7 21.698381199 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 7.06452816374 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.352901320687 0.272083759551 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.117912783301 0.0996497079465 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.08158760962 0.0662205650399 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.191001193325 0.162205337803 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0380166897057 0.0443174109184 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.3589403974 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 53.8541721854 118% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 11.0289183223 76% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.06 12.2367328918 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.54 8.42419426049 113% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 63.6247240618 85% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.7273730684 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.498013245 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 68.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.