The professor disagrees with the article which states some solutions for endangered frogs in order to make this process slower. She provides some reasons and examples that prove her idea.
First of all, the lecturer states that using pesticides to attack adverse insects can economically harm farmer's products. For instance if they apply this solution on their products they would have less crops than other competitors in other lands which do not need to use this chemical materials. This cats doubt on the text which cites hat using pesticide endanger frogs population.
Another striking reason that the lecturer takes into account is in order to preventing fog disease people should treat them individually, and what's more , it should apply on every generation of frogs which takes too mush money and energy. This contradicts on reading which claims that in order to preventing frog's skin from dehydration we should apply some medicine on their skins.
Finally, the professor discuss that using water is not the key factor for frogs extinction, but global warming which can affect on reducing water sources is the main problem. Which opposes the reading that asserts by using water we change frog's habitat, in other words, they can not lay eggs anymore.
To sum up, the professor disagrees with the reading on all three points, and believes these solutions even bring us more challenging. We should use some other valuable and economic solutions to outwit this problem.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 14, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The professor disagrees with the article which states ...
^^
Line 3, column 82, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ing pesticides to attack adverse insects can economically harm farmers products. ...
^^
Line 3, column 199, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun crops is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...ution on their products they would have less crops than other competitors in other l...
^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...g pesticide endanger frogs population. Another striking reason that the lecture...
^^^
Line 5, column 143, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: what's
...ple should treat them individually, and whats more , it should apply on every generat...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 153, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... treat them individually, and whats more , it should apply on every generation of ...
^^
Line 5, column 213, Rule ID: TOO_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'to mush'?
Suggestion: to mush
...n every generation of frogs which takes too mush money and energy. This contradicts on r...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 122, Rule ID: AFFECT_EFFECT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'effect'?
Suggestion: effect
...xtinction, but global warming which can affect on reducing water sources is the main prob...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, if, so, for instance, first of all, in other words, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 10.4613686534 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 5.04856512141 178% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 22.412803532 116% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 30.3222958057 89% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1244.0 1373.03311258 91% => OK
No of words: 240.0 270.72406181 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.18333333333 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.93597934253 4.04702891845 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.42976441258 2.5805825403 94% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 145.348785872 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.595833333333 0.540411800872 110% => OK
syllable_count: 369.9 419.366225166 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 4.0 8.23620309051 49% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.51434878587 198% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.7590370489 49.2860985944 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.090909091 110.228320801 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8181818182 21.698381199 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.45454545455 7.06452816374 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 4.19205298013 191% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.294977542988 0.272083759551 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.118030046803 0.0996497079465 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0743420337882 0.0662205650399 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.159957629134 0.162205337803 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0859086301442 0.0443174109184 194% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.3589403974 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 53.8541721854 109% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 12.2367328918 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.56 8.42419426049 102% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 63.6247240618 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.