The reading passage and the lecture discuss this fascinating topic the problem of declining frog populations. Frogs are important for ecosystems and they help play a role in protecting humans by eating disease-carrying insects. The article claims that they know the way to protect frogs population he provides three methods for protecting frogs population. The lecture cast has serious doubt on the claims of the reading passage, according to the professor the methods are not a practical solution.
First of all, the author of the reading passage states that If laws prohibited the farmers from using harmful pesticides near sensitive frog populations. This point is challenged by the professor she said that rule to stop using pesticides for the farmer is not the economical particle although pesticides are harmful to frogs but the farmers are a heavy relay on the pesticides for saving their farms if there is a rule for only those farmer who has frames near to sensitive frog populations will be in great disadvantage there will grow lot fewer crops than other farmers they will be behind in competition.
Secondly, the reading passage states that fungus has deadly effect on frogs prevent if treatment applied would protect sensitive frog populations from infection. This point rebuts by professor she side said that the researchers has developed treatmet for this but it needs to apply by indivisuly on a large scale this very difficult moreover they are not passed into the skin so they have to apply each new frogs.
Finally, the article states that habitats are threatened by human activities which cause frog populations are in decline. The lecture said that human activities are caused some problem for frog populations but the main problme is something else and that problem is global warming is the main caused for this.
In summary, both reading passage and lecture give some important knowleged about frog populations decline but a significant amount of fact support that there is no partical solution. Therefore reading passage failed to justify.
- Topic: Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?People who develop many different skills are more successful than people who just focus on only one skill.60
- Some people believe that a college or university education should be available to all students. Others believe that higher education should be available only to good students. Discuss these views. Which view do you agree with? Explain why.73
- TPO-04 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.60
- TPO-43 - Independent Writing Task Imagine that you are in a classroom or a meeting. The teacher or the meeting leader says something incorrect In your opinion, which of the following is the best thing to do?-Interrupt and correct the mistake right away-Wa73
- TPO23 – Independent: A/D? In today's world, it is more important to work quickly and risk making mistakes than to work slowly and make sure that everything is correct. 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 184, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
...ort that there is no partical solution. Therefore reading passage failed to justify.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, in summary, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 10.4613686534 163% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 22.412803532 116% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 30.3222958057 109% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1741.0 1373.03311258 127% => OK
No of words: 335.0 270.72406181 124% => OK
Chars per words: 5.19701492537 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27820116611 4.04702891845 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69689556931 2.5805825403 105% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 145.348785872 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.498507462687 0.540411800872 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 539.1 419.366225166 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 21.2450331126 127% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 98.3033852701 49.2860985944 199% => OK
Chars per sentence: 145.083333333 110.228320801 132% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.9166666667 21.698381199 129% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.66666666667 7.06452816374 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.432994429895 0.272083759551 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.178190675481 0.0996497079465 179% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.107724391267 0.0662205650399 163% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.235486520283 0.162205337803 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0726330149481 0.0443174109184 164% => OK
automated_readability_index: 17.0 13.3589403974 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 53.8541721854 82% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 5.55761589404 202% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.0289183223 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.18 12.2367328918 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.75 8.42419426049 104% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 63.6247240618 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.7273730684 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.498013245 122% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.