TPO 49
The article states that there is whale, humpback whale, which takes advantage of stars to navigate, like humans. However, the professor explains that they are fascinating creatures but evidence shows that this whole idea would not be correct. He casts doubt on every author's reasons.
First, the reading posits that these whales seem to be so intelligent to navigate by stars. The professor refutes this point by saying that it seems that there is not a real connection between intelligence and animal's ability. He states that there are some birds which have this ability like ducks, but the evidence reveals that it is solely an average ability not a high intelligence.
Second, in the article it is claimed that because of the fact that these animals cannot depend on land features to maintain their movement in straight lines they use stars to navigate by. However, they might have some other external forces, the professor say. According to the professor, research has shown that they rely on magnetic field of earth. Their brain has a bio-magnetic sense which leads to orientation when they are migrating.
Third, the reading asserts that they have an unusual behavior. They look upward when they are swimming. The professor opposes this point by clarifying that this habit has nothing to do with spy-hopping. We also learn that it is rare but there some animals which perform this habit without that purpose, like sharks which do that merely due to the hunting.
Comments
Sorry, there is no TPO 49 in
Sorry, there is no TPO 49 in testbig yet, so you got the warning message: 'It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.'
The actual score is about 24 in 30.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 366, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[3]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'high intelligence'.
Suggestion: high intelligence
...hat it is solely an average ability not a high intelligence. Second, in the article it is claime...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 43, Rule ID: BECAUSE_OF_THE_FACT_THAT[1]
Message: This phrase is redundant. Use simply 'because'.
Suggestion: because
...cond, in the article it is claimed that because of the fact that these animals cannot depend on land fea...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, look, second, so, third
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 23.0 12.0772626932 190% => OK
Pronoun: 41.0 22.412803532 183% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 30.3222958057 89% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1234.0 1373.03311258 90% => OK
No of words: 245.0 270.72406181 90% => OK
Chars per words: 5.03673469388 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.95632099841 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.42848567847 2.5805825403 94% => OK
Unique words: 138.0 145.348785872 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.563265306122 0.540411800872 104% => OK
syllable_count: 376.2 419.366225166 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.6172452399 49.2860985944 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.1428571429 110.228320801 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5 21.698381199 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.85714285714 7.06452816374 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.3589403974 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 53.8541721854 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.0289183223 79% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 12.2367328918 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.22 8.42419426049 98% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 63.6247240618 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.